Sony, Canon, and Nikon are the three fierce competitors to one another concerning the cameras. If you are one of them looking ahead to the best experience regarding quality camera beasts, the Canon EOS R vs Sony A7R is the two capable options you can check out. How do these two cameras compare with one another? We will check out the differences between the two high-end performers.
Canon EOS R vs Sony A7R – How do They Compare with One Another?
Well, both of them are the best full-frame mirrorless cameras, and Sony brought out the excellent performers among the ILCs or Interchangeable Lens Cameras, and the Sony A7R is one of the beasts in the line-up.
We will compare them based on the few key parameters. That would offer you a proper input into how do they compare with one another.
The Resolution
The Sony A7R comes with a back-illuminated sensor at 42.2 MP resolution. It does not offer you a low pass filter as such and will not provide any option of maximizing the sharpness. You also have an LSI chip that improves the processing speed.
The Canon EOS R has a 30.3 MP resolution. It comes with an updated version of the chip and also offers you a microlens option for the short-range mount. You have access to a low pass filter on your camera.
Features / Particulars
Sony A7R III
Canon EOS R
Sensor Type
BSI CMOS
CMOS
Size
Full frame – E-MOUNT
Full frame – RF Mount
Sensor Format
35 mm (Exmor R)
35 mm
Sensor dimensions
35.6mm x 23.8mm
36mm x 24.0mm
Resolution
42.4 MP
30.3 MP
Canon EOS R does not offer you a sensor stabilization. The Sensor stabilization has been one of the most sought-after options in mirrorless cameras, and the omission may not be taken well by the fans of mirrorless cameras. You may need to go with the lenses with the image stabilization capabilities.
Sony A7R, on the other hand, offers you a 5 axis stabilization option. Sony claims that it is the best you would find on a Sony camera. That would make it an exceptional choice for use on any lens whether it has any kind of focussing option or not.
The ISO Range
As long as ISO range is concerned, Canon EOS R offers you a range between 100 to 40000. You have the option of pushing it between 50 and 102400 through extension. For the Sony, the ISO range available is up to 32000. You would be able to extend it between 50 and 102400.
Both the cameras would disappoint to some extent with the lower value of ISO. Both the competitors offer you a 50 ISO option. We would have loved the option for around 32 ISO.
Autofocus
Both of them come with on-sensor phase detection autofocus option. The points make use of smaller sensors to find the phase difference and suitably apply the difference to lock into the right focus.
Canon opts for the Dual Pixel CMOS Autofocus. Here, each pixel is made of two photodiodes instead of one. Sony comes with one pair of pixels that are masked partially. One of the pixels receives the light on the right while the other receive them on the left.
Canon beats Sony regarding focus points quite massively. It has 5655 points! That is indeed the highest number for any camera we have ever found. Sony offers you 399 phase detection points. There are 425 contrast detection points as well. The focus would cover 88 percent of width and 100 percent of height on Canon EOS R, while Sony has 68 percent of the sensor covered.
Canon claims the fastest autofocus is locking at 0.05 sec. Sony has not released any official figure for the metric. The minimum sensitivity on Sony A7R is -3V with an f/2 lens. Canon would offer you a better option at -4.5V at the same rating.
The Size and Weight
In that genre, you would find both the cameras in the same league. The Sony A7R has a 657 grams weight, and the weight of EOS R stands at 660 grams.
Regarding the size or physical dimensions, Sony is smaller than the Canon EOS R. The physical dimensions of the camera read 126.9 x 73.7 x 95.6mm. The Canon EOS R has the physical aspects of 135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4 mm.
A comfortable gripping is one of the features we liked the most about Canon EOS R. Sony may feel awkward to handle if you are using larger sensors.
Video Shooting Compatibility
Well, both the cameras offer you the 4K shooting compatibility. Almost all the features are practically equivalent to one another on either of the cameras.
Sony offers you multiple options to work with while recording in 4K. You can go with the full frame mode for a functional service. If you are shooting in full HD, Canon EOS R offers you 60 fps and 180 Mbps. Sony, on the other hand, can go up to 120 fps and 100Mbps. The same kind of frame rate would only be possible with Canon if you choose 720p.
The ISO range offered on EOS R can reach up to 12800 while shooting in 4K and 25600 for the 1080p videos. The Sony A7R can go as far as 32000. However, you would not be able to push the extended values. As for the profiles, EOS R offers you Canon Log profile for use in internal and external recordings. The Sony A7R comes with a host of customization options regarding picture profiles.
The Storage
Regarding storage options, Sony uses dual SD cards for its A7R lineup. Canon, on the other hand, would offer you SD card alone. That would indicate the service is moving towards a professional consumer level performance on its cameras.
Battery Performance
The Sony A7R offers you an estimated 530 exposures for a single battery charge. The Canon EOS R is slightly lower in performance regarding battery backup and should provide you with 430 shots per charge. We would expect that Canon would come with additional battery packs.
Do note that these ratings are entirely theoretical. In the real world scenarios, you would find better results. Both the cameras offer USB charging.
The Lens System
When it comes to the availability of lenses, Sony excels with its full line up of options. You can make use of E-Mount lenses on Sony for both full frame and APS-C camera options. The cross-compatibility of Sony cameras is best placed in comparison to the Canon systems you find.
Burst Rate
We were expecting a better burst shooting option on Canon EOS R given its smaller megapixel count. It offers you a continuous burst shooting options of just 8 fps. However, the continuous shooting with autofocus would be still slower than that at 5.5 fps. The speed can go even shorter at 3 fps if you are opting for C-AF and Focus priority. Sony offers you a better functionality at 10 fps no matter what settings you are opting for.
The Sony A7R can take 76 RAW or JPG files. On the other hand, Canon EOS R can handle 47 RAW files, 78 Compressed files, and 100 JPG files and thus can be a better option. However, the faster burst speed combined with, the better resolution should make it one of the excellent choices. It indeed offers you a consistent performance than the Canon offering.
The Concluding Thoughts
Canon is trying to capture the mirrorless camera market, and the EOS R is indeed the first attempt in that direction. Of course, if you are a canon fan and want to try out their first encounter in the realm, this should be one of the good options you can go with. Of course, we would expect Canon to come with new offerings quite soon.
The Sony A7R has been one of the great options you can give a try too. The image quality should be one of the best given the 42.4 MP functionality that it offers. Even regarding video shooting options, we find Sony A7R providing you with a higher degree of flexibility. EOS R applies a 1.7x crop while you record in 4K.
In any case, we would look ahead for and foresee a good deal of competition in the realm, and that would indeed be a lot of advanced options for the consumer at large.
The full-frame mirrorless cameras have been the new trend. Canon, which has been at the forefront of the development of the new cameras, has recently launched its EOS R to take care of the segment. In an attempt to show off the capabilities of the brand new RF mount, Canon has recently launched four new RF lenses. We will check out the newly launched RF lenses and the options that they come with finer details.
Best Canon RF Lenses – An Overview
Canon has recently launched its new full-frame mirrorless camera – the EOS R. Positioned as the flagship model in the realm of mirrorless cameras, it boasts of the original RF mount. Before we move on to understand the concept of RF lenses and their compatibility – we will check out what precisely an RF mount is.
RF Mount – What It is?
Well, as you might have already understood, the new RF mount is a new concept launched with the EOS R full frame mirrorless camera. Announced in September 2018, the camera features a full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lenses camera.
Do note that the RF mount would not be compatible with the Canon EF and EF-S mount lenses. However, you can opt for the three Canon adapters specifically designed for use with the RF mount. The RF mount makes it possible to use the new RF lenses.
What features do RF Lenses Come With?
Image Source: Canon
Well, RF lenses are a part of the new era of lenses. They have been designed for a high-quality performance along with an emphasis on speed. The lenses are specifically designed for the new EOS R camera. They offer you more advanced levels of intuitive controls.
You have access to the customizable Control Ring. The Control Ring offers you the options for using the aperture compensation, shutter speed, ISO and compensation for exposure. You can make adjustments without the need for looking away from the subject. They offer you the best options for a natural shooting performance.
The Best Canon RF Lenses – The new Launches
Canon has recently launched four new lenses in the RF genre along with the new Canon EOS R camera. While two of them are suited for the newly launched EOS R, the other two are with the widest aperture. Possibly, canon wants to show off the capabilities that the RF mount comes with. Like we said before, all the four lenses come with their control rings.
The new Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is designed to fit in the shoes of the most popular Canon lenses – the Canon 24-105mm f/4L. While the older generation lens is for the full frame cameras, the new RF lens is designed for the mirrorless option.
The key features Offred by the lens include
Utterly versatile design for use in practical and professional zoom functionality.
You have access to 5 stop image stabilization for enhanced quality.
The lens ensures better sharpness even in low light scenarios.
Best suited for steadier handheld performance.
The Nano USM autofocus offers smoother and faster autofocus.
The lens should be best suited for portrait photography, creative ideas, and travel photography. The lens comes with Aspherical lens elements compensating for distortion and spherical aberration.
If you are looking for a lens with the macro capabilities and a faster aperture, the RF 35mm f/1.8 IS Macro STM should fit your bill exactly the way you would want it to.
A few salient features of the lens include
High-end image quality coupled with a wide angle lens.
Best in class low light performance. You should be able to capture the right kind of ambiance even in dark environment.
5 stop stabilization for the sharpest images ever in low light.
Excellent quality micro shots.
The best option for portability with its compact size.
The lens would suit you best if you are into travel photography, close up shots and landscape photography needs.
Are you a professional photographer and are looking for the best experience regarding immensely superior sharpness, creative control and low light performance – you would indeed be more than happy with the new RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens from Canon.
The ultimate 50 mm lens from Canon boasts of the following features –
A super bright design with the highest image quality.
Faster optical performance
The best in class L series photography
Best suited for professional photography requirements.
The best application areas that the lens would suit include portrait photography, street photography and excellent art shots.
Advanced zoom capabilities would make it one of the best options regarding the RF cameras for your need. Canon claims that the lens redefines the zoom performance.
A few features worthy of mentioning include
It is considered to be the best first large aperture zoom lens compatible with full frame devices
A consistent f/2.0 brightness throughout the zoom range
The perfect silent zoom with Canon’s USM technology.
Smarter controls for an efficient and natural shooting.
The application areas that the lens would be most suitable include travel photography, wedding photography, and photojournalism.
The Spec Sheet
Zoom Range
24 to 105 mm
Minimum Focus
0.39 mm
Lens Control Option
Control Ring
Aperture
9 Blade
Motor
USM
Lens Construction
19 elements in 13 Groups
Maximum Aperture
f/2
Minimum Aperture
22
The Parting Thoughts
Well, these are the currently available RF lenses from Canon as things stand as of now. There have been rumors about the new launches. However, we would not like to comment on them until canon officially announces the new lenses.
Before we conclude, we would like to make it clear that if you do not have a camera with RF mount, you would not be able to make use of any of these lenses. They are NOT backward compatible and would not fit on the older EF or EF-S mounts. However, if you have the older lenses, they can be used with the cameras with RF mount easily by opting for the appropriate adapters from Canon.
Nikon, as we are all aware of, is one of the prominent players in the realm of DSLR cameras. The company recently launched its new entry-level DSLR without much hoopla. How does D3500 compare with the predecessor the D3400? Let us compare the two devices (Nikon D3500 vs D3400) and understand what improvements does the D3500 pack in on the new offering.
Nikon D3500 vs D3400 – A Close Comparison
Well, both Nikon D3500 and D3400 are entry-level DSLR cameras and have many things in common. However, the D3500 being the upgrade and a newly launched device has a few features different from the predecessor. We will compare the two cameras based on a few key parameters.
The Sensor
In terms of the sensor compatibility, the D3500 comes with the same 24 MP pixel count as on the D3400. Both of them offer the same APS-C sensor and do not provide the optical low pass filter.
On the specification sheet, we observe the D3500 having a 24.78 MP resolution as compared to the 24.72 MP on the D3400. Though technically slightly different, this should not have any major effect from the practical perspective.
However, the D3500 may be a good option given it is new and comes with better sensor configuration.
As can be seen from the above table, both D3500 and D3400 have the same physical dimensions. However, the weight of the D3400 is a little more. It could be a key consideration when you consider portability.
The Design
From the design point of view, you are bound to find a few differences between the D3500 and D3400. The grip on the D3500 is a little better than that on the D3400. This should be quite helpful when you use the camera. Moreover, a better grip can also translate into better handling when you are using long or front heavy lenses with your camera.
There have been a few other changes as well concerning the design. The buttons you found on the left-hand side of the LCD screen on the D3400 have been shifted to the top and right-hand side. This aids in a better ergonomics. The flash button that resided on the front on D3400 has now stands moved to the rear.
Well, both the Nikon D3500 and D3400 come with almost similar features and functionalities. You can opt for any of them and expect the same features across them.
A few slight differences you may observe on the new Nikon D3500 include
Better Battery Capability – The battery backup per charge is quite good compared to the Nikon D3400. You get 1550 shots per charge as compared to the 1200 shots per charge on the Nikon D3400.
An Enhanced Grip – As we already explained, the grip has been improved, and it can be a better option towards handling. It can also be helpful if you are using heavier lenses.
New Button layout – The button layout on the camera has been changed and now placed quite ergonomically. You can now concentrate on the subject before you rather than fiddling with the buttons.
Guide Mode for new Users – This will help the new users to get used to the functionality of the camera. It will help you learn the functioning easily.
SnapBridge Function – The Bluetooth based file transfer mode helps to transfer your images and videos straightaway without any need to connect to your computer. It can also be used for remote trigger functionality as well.
The Concluding Thoughts
Well, that was the complete comparison between the two capable DSLR cameras from Nikon. We will recommend you opt for the new variant given the additional features that it comes with. But, in case you are considering upgrading your current Nikon D3400 for a new Nikon D3500, we would not find a good option as such.
As you can observe from the above comparison chart and another discussion we carried out, the new D3500 is almost equivalent in every aspect (that should matter the most) to the three-year-old Nikon D3400. From that perspective – upgrading from a D3400 to a D3500 may not be a great idea. You may either wait for an upgrade from Nikon or go with any other option.
Have you used either the Nikon D3500 or D3400? If you have, you can share your thoughts and experiences with us. This will help our readers and us in understanding the differences and practical usability of a few best Nikon masterpieces.
When it comes to cameras, several technologies rule the roost. Of course, the exact technique that you will opt for will be dependent upon the shooting requirements that you may be looking ahead to. One such prominent category you would love is Superzoom cameras. If you are looking for the best Superzoom cameras from Canon, the two notable names that come to our mind are the Canon PowerShot SX740 HS vs SX540 HS. Let us compare the two cameras and choose the best one among them.
What are SuperZoom Cameras?
Well, there are situations where you would not or cannot go closer to an object, but looking for a close and personal shot. This is where an excellent zoom capacity would come handy. However, as we are aware of, too much zooming can result in pixelated images or a reduction in the quality of your pictures.
SuperZoom cameras are the kind that they offer you superior image quality that it provides you with a high zoom capability. You get an exceptional image quality even at high zoom levels. SuperZoom cameras are equipped to give you optical zoom levels as high as 83X! You will indeed the experience with the excellent zoom capabilities.
Canon PowerShot SX740 HS vs SX540 HS – A Complete Comparison
Let us compare the two competing devices one by one based on a few key features. This will help us understand the distinctions and similarities between the two siblings.
Both the siblings are similar in terms of its physical dimensions. However, given the fact that the portability is also a major factor, the weight of SX540 HS can be a deciding factor in many cases.
Sensor Comparison
Features/ Particulars
Canon Powershot SX740 HS
Canon Powershot SX540 HS
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
1/2.3”
1/2.3”
Sensor Resolution
20.3 MP
20.3 MP
The sensor specifications of both the cameras remain equivalent. But, if you still have to choose between the two options, the more recent option in the form of PowerShot SX740 HS should be an ideal alternative for you.
Lens Comparison
Features/ Particulars
Canon Powershot SX740 HS
Canon Powershot SX540 HS
Wide Coverage
24 mm
24 mm
Telezoom
960 mm
1200 mm
Max aperture at Tele-Zoom
F 6.5
F 6.9
Max Wide aperture
F 3.40
F 3.30
The lens comparison indicates that both of the devices are almost identical in most aspects, but the SX540 HS comes with a slightly better performance in terms of its Tele-Zoom functionality.
Other Features
Features/ Particulars
Canon Powershot SX740 HS
Canon Powershot SX540 HS
Optical Zoom
40 X
50 X
Digital Zoom
Yes, available – 4X
Yes, available – 4X
ISO Sensitivity
80 to 32000
80 to 32000
Normal focal range
50 cm
5 CM
Macro Focal range
1 cm
1 cm
Focal length
24 to 960 mm
24 to 1200 mm
Max aperture
f3.4 – f6.9
f3.3 – f5.9
Max Shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/2000 sec
Built-in Flash
Yes
Yes
Presets for white balance
5
5
Screen
3”- 921,000 dots
3”- 921,000 dots
Screen articulation
Yes
No
Max video resolution
4K at 25p and 30p
1920×1080 at 60p and 30p
Storage type
SD, SDHC and SDXC
SD, SDHC and SDXC
HDMI connectivity
Yes
Yes
Wireless Connectivity
Yes- Bluetooth and WiFi
Yes – Bluetooth and WiFi
NFC
No
Yes
Battery Life
265 shots per charge
205 shots per charge
Why do We Prefer Canon PowerShot SX740 HS?
The Canon PowerShot SX740 HS has the better camera functionality, higher sensitivity and a display that offers you an excellent resolution. The articulated screen is another added advantage that improves the seamless photography.
The 4K video recording should be one of the features that makes it an ideal option for you if you are into video recording more than images. The PowerShot SX740 comes with a low weight which makes it more compact and thus improves its portability by a few counts. One more factor that we thought would go in favor of the SX740 HS would be the excellent battery backup in comparison to the SX540 HS.
Why Would We Prefer Canon PowerShot SX540 HS?
Well, we did not find many features on the SX540 HS that would stand above the SX740 HS under ideal circumstances.
There are only a couple of reasons we could come across with Canon PowerShot SX540 HS that could beat the PowerShot SX740 HS. It offers you the NFC connectivity in addition to the other connectivity options. The SX740 has only 960 mm telephoto lens reach, while the Powershot SX540 HS gives you a range of 1200 mm.
Which among them should you go with?
Well, we do not think there is indeed any specific choice here. The Canon PowerShot SX740 scores over the PowerShot SX540 HS by many counts. There is practically only one choice you have between them. Moreover, the SX540 HS is almost two years old when compared to the SX740 HS. As we are well aware, the newer devices tend to come with added features and functionalities. From that point of view, we would consider that the Canon PowerShot SX740 would be a better choice compared to the SX540.
Having said that you should also understand that both the cameras come with almost similar features leaving aside the areas that they differ in. Image stabilization, built-in flash, WiFi connectivity, HDMI and manual focus are a few areas that these two share the same features. Ultimately, it is your exact requirement and the budget you have set aside that should play an important role in choosing the right camera. From that perspective, we would assume that the feature sets and the differences that we have listed in should go a long way aiding you to make the right choice.
Weight the requirements that you have set for while choosing the camera and make a learned choice.
Well, the superzoom category has been one of the most promising and favorite genres in the photography arena. If you are considering to op for the Superzoom cameras with smaller sensor size, the two intelligent choices in this arena are the Nikon Coolpix A900 vs Canon Powershot SX730. Which among these two cameras would we recommend you? Let us compare the two cameras and their features for arriving at the best features that either of them offers you.
Superzoom cameras tend to be the new age criteria for the best in photography. In fact, what makes them an ideal choice is the superior zoom capability that they offer you without having to sacrifice the quality of the images.
They can be your best options when you need to shoot images from close quarters without going close. Prime examples of this type shots can be those in the wild or Zoos. You want a picture up close, and much personal, but cannot afford to go that close. Those are the scenarios where a superzoom camera would be an exciting and useful possession.
They offer you such high degree of optical zoom that often goes as high as 83X in many cases. Isn’t that an enjoyable experience to be shooting something with such an incredible zoom?
Nikon Coolpix A900 vs Canon Powershot SX730 – A complete comparison
We will begin the correlation between the two competing cameras based on a few critical parameters. We will be focussing on a tabulated comparison chart for each of the subsets of features so that we will be able to see the differences side by side.
Weight can be an important factor while handling your cameras because it will determine the baggage you carry along. However, in the case of Canon Powershot SX730 and Nikon Coolpix A900, the weight difference is quite negligible and should not pose a huge difference.
Sensor Comparison
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix A900
Canon Powershot SX730
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
1/2.3”
1/2.3”
Sensor Resolution
5158 x 3878
5196 x 3907
We would consider the competing cameras to have almost similar features regarding sensor capabilities as well. They have a slight difference concerning the sensor resolution where the Canon SX730 takes an upper edge over the Nikon Coolpix A900.
Lens Comparison
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix A900
Canon Powershot SX730
Wide Coverage
24 mm
24 mm
Telezoom
840 mm
960 mm
Max aperture at Tele-zoom
F 6.9
F 6.9
Max Wide aperture
F 3.40
F 3.30
Again, both the cameras offer the similar functionalities and features.
Other Features
We will compare the other features in a tabulated manner to find the subtle differences side by side. This will help you arrive at the best features that each of the cameras offers.
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix A900
Canon Powershot SX730
Optical Zoom
35 X
40 X
Digital Zoom
Yes, available – 4X
Yes, available – 4X
ISO Sensitivity
80 to 32000
80 to 32000
Normal focal range
50 cm
5 CM
Macro Focal range
1 cm
1 cm
Focal length
24 to 840 mm
24 to 960 mm
Max aperture
f3.4 – f6.9
f3.3 – f5.9
Max Shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/3200 sec
Built-in Flash
Yes
Yes
Presets for white balance
5
5
Screen
3”- 921,000 dots
3”- 921,000 dots
Screen articulation
Yes
No
Max video resolution
3840×2160 at 25p and 30p
1920×1080 at 60p and 30p
Storage type
SD, SDHC and SDXC
SD, SDHC and SDXC
HDMI connectivity
Yes
Yes
Wireless Connectivity
Yes- Bluetooth and WiFi
Yes – Bluetooth and WiFi
Battery Life
300 shots per charge
250 shots per charge
Why Would You Choose Nikon Coolpix A900 over Canon Powershot SX730?
The Nikon Coolpix A900 comes with the following features you will not find on the competitor. Some essential elements that make it a better option than the Canon Powershot Sx730 can be summed up as
Maximum shutter speed at 1/4000 sec as compared to 1/3200 sec
Faster continuous shooting at 7.0 fps as compared to 5.9 fps
Better battery backup with 350 shots per charge as compared to 250.
Provision for time-lapse recording that aids you to be creative with your photography.
Better flash coverage at 7.0 meters as compared to 4.0 meters
Higher video resolution at 3840 x 2160 pixels as opposed to Full HD resolution
Why Would You Choose Canon Powershot SX730 over Nikon Coolpix A900?
Not to be left behind, the Canon Powershot SX730 boasts of a few unique features you may not be able to find on the Nikon Coolpix A900. Some of these features include
It offers you the manual focusing that helps you in better focusing maneuver.
A slightly better focal reach at 960 mm as compared to 840 mm on Coolpix A900
Higher optical zoom at 40X as compared to 35X
Faster lens at the wider aperture at 3.30 as opposed to 3.40
Which One Should You Opt for?
Well, given the complete comparison as in the above discussion, you can infer that both the cameras come with almost equal functionality and performance levels. The factors that go in favor of the Nikon Coolpix A900 tend to be a faster camera performance, a slightly better battery backup and better video resolution. At the same time, the Canon Powershot SX730 impresses with its better and speedier sensitivity coupled with the proper autofocus functionality.
In essence, we found both Canon Powershot SX730 and Nikon Coolpix A900 offering almost equal performance in every respect. Given the fact that they offer the identical scores regarding the features, we would, in fact, give weight to the recent devices among them. However, even on that count, they are just one year apart from each other. If you think a slightly newer model is what you are looking for, the Canon Powershot SX730 should be your best choice. If that isn’t a criterion you are interested in, either of those would make the best purchase.
Well, when it comes to cameras – Sony and Nikon have been known to be the two popular manufacturers. If you are looking for the best superzoom cameras for your needs, the two best options from these two that have been attracting a few customers are the Nikon Coolpix B500 vs Sony H300. Launched in 2016 and 2014 respectively, these two have created enough interest in the superzoom category. How do these cameras compare with each other? Let us check out the features of these superzoom cameras in more exquisite detail.
What is A Superzoom Camera?
Superzoom is a new industry norm when it comes to the cameras that are not as expensive as the DSLRs but offer a better zoom capability. There are times when you need to images right from the front and close. But, you may not be able to get that close and personal – physically. That is where the Superzoom cameras can come in handy most of the times.
As per the name, these cameras offer an incredible zoom capability. Some of these cameras can get as close as 83X! Some of these superzoom cameras feature small sensors you may not find on traditional point and shoot cameras. What makes them a good option is the ability to provide a good quality even with those superior zoom capabilities.
Nikon Coolpix B500 vs Sony H300 – A Comparison
Let us check out the two superzoom cameras based on a few critical parameters. We will go with a tabulated comparison for a better understanding.
Physical Properties
Features/ Particulars
Nikon B 500
Sony H300
Dimensions
114 x 78 x 95 mm
130 x95 x 122 mm
Weight
541 grams
590 grams
As we can find, the Nikon Coolpix B500 is smaller among the two competitors. Weight can be a significant factor as long as carrying the camera is concerned. However, both the competing devices do not seem to differ much regarding physical weight.
Sensor
Features/ Particulars
Nikon B 500
Sony H300
Sensor Type
CMOS
CCD
Sensor Size
1/2.3″ (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
1/2.3″ (~ 6.16 x 4.62 mm)
Resolution
4612 x 3468
5171 x 3888
Resolution in MP
16 MP
20 MP
Sensor size plays an important role regarding image quality. In our case, both the cameras offer you the same performance standards regarding sensor size. However, given the fact that Nikon B500 and Sony H300 have a two-year difference between the two of them, we would expect Nikon B500 to offer better performance. Newer sensors have been observed to come with better functionality.
Lens Specifications
Features/ Particulars
Nikon B 500
Sony H300
Wide Coverage
23 mm
25 mm
Telezoom
900 mm
875 mm
Maximum Aperture
F 6.50
F 9.50
Maximum Wide aperture
F 3.0
F 3.0
The Nikon B500 offers you slightly wider coverage than the Sony H300. Rest of the features tend to be almost similar.
Other Features
We present a complete comparison chart for the other features so that we would be able to get a clear overview of both the cameras and their strengths.
In fact, on account of these features that the B500 from Nikon takes the lead over Sony Cybershot H300 as you would be able to make out through the comparison.
Features/ Particulars
Nikon B 500
Sony H300
Optical Zoom
40 X
35 X
Digital Zoom
Yes, available
Yes, available
ISO Sensitivity
80 to 32000
80 to 32000
Normal focal range
30 cm
30 cm
Macro Focal range
1 cm
1 cm
Focal length
23 to 900 mm
25 to 875 mm
Max aperture
f3.0 – f6.5
f3.0 – f5.9
Max Shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/1500 sec
Built-in Flash
Yes
Yes
Presets for white balance
5
7
Screen
3”- 921,000 dots
3” – 460,800 dots
Screen articulation
Yes
No
Max video resolution
1920 x 1080
1280 x 720
Storage type
SD, SDHC and SDXC
SD, SDHC, Memory Stick Duo
HDMI connectivity
Yes
No
Wireless Connectivity
Yes- Bluetooth and WiFi
No
Battery Life
600 shots per charge
350 shots per charge
Features in Favour of Sony H300 as against Nikon Coolpix B500
Here are a few features that have the upper hand over Nikon Coolpix B500 –
Maximum resolution of 20 MP as opposed to 16 MP
The maximum telephoto aperture of 5.90 as opposed 6.5. This ensures a faster lens performance
Flash coverage at 8.8 meters as opposed 6.9 meters.
Features in Favour of Nikon Coolpix B500 as against Sony H300
Where does Nikon Coolpix take an upper edge in comparison to the Sony H300? Here are few comparative differences-
Wireless connectivity options through Bluetooth and WiFi. This ensures better connectivity
The articulating screen that provides flexibility while shooting
LCD screen resolution at 921k dots as opposed to 460k dots
Faster shutter speed at 1/4000 sec
Continuous shooting capability at 7.4 fps as against 1.0 fps
Better battery backup with 600 shots per charge as against 350 shots
Slightly better optical zoom with 40X as compared to 35X.
Can be controlled with a smartphone
Full HD video recording at 1080p
The Concluding Thoughts
Well, based on the comparison above and the points scored by each of the cameras, we would consider the Nikon Coolpix B500 as better equipped to meet the needs a camera buff – whether a hobbyist or a professional.
Apart from the specific points that we have outlined here, the Nikon B500 offer you a better sensitivity and a higher resolution. A few additional features like an articulated screen add up to the usability that the camera provides you. A compact size, more battery life and a full HD resolution video recording are a few other features that would put it ahead of the competition as against the Sony H300. The connectivity features offered on the Nikon camera can be another feather in the cap for the B500 given the importance that the connected devices gain in the current scenario.
Having gone through all the specifications and the features, we would indeed conclude that the Nikon Coolpix B500 is the best catch in comparison to the Sony Cybershot H300.
Nikon has been one of the prominent players when it comes to cameras. If you are looking for the fixed lens cameras from the manufacturer, Nikon Coolpix P1000 vs. Nikon Coolpix P900 have been the two best models that have been quite popular in the genre. Launched three years apart, how do these two siblings perform against each other? We will check out the features, specifications, and differences between the two capable models from the manufacturer.
What is a Fixed Lens Camera?
Well, the definition should be quite evident from the name of the genre itself. The fixed lens cameras are the ones that do look almost like a DSLR. The only major differentiating factor between a fixed lens camera and a DSLR should be the lack of support for the interchangeable lenses on the former.
By description, a fixed lens camera is the one that does not use interchangeable lenses. From that perspective, the definition can range to include large zoom cameras to the point and shoot models that we have used in the past. In fact, the smartphone camera too can be one of the best fixed-lens cameras for that matter.
However, in the technical language of photography, a fixed lens camera is the one that has a large zoom lens and looks like the DSLRs. The term is ides mainly to let you know the difference between a DSLR and the fixed large zoom lens cameras.
Having understood what a fixed lens camera is and how it differs from the DSLRs, let us now check how the Nikon Coolpix P1000 and Nikon Coolpix P900 compare with each other. We will make a comparison based on a few critical features for a clear understanding.
Physical Features
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix P900
Nikon Coolpix P1000
Physical Dimensions
140 x 103 x 137 mm
146 x 119 x 181 mm
Weight
899 grams
1415 grams
By comparison, both Coolpix P1000 and Coolpix P900 do seem to have the same compact structure and do not differ much. However, weight can be a differentiating factor considerably. Given the fact that portability can be a huge factor, the Coolpix P900 offers you a little lighter option.
It should be noted that neither of the two cameras comes with any weather sealing. You need to take care while handling them in severe weather conditions.
Sensor Comparison
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix P900
Nikon Coolpix P1000
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
1/2.3”
1/2.3”
Sensor Resolution
4608 x 3456
4608 x 3456
The sensor features for both the cameras are completely identical in almost all respects. Even the megapixel count remains same at 16 MP on both of them. Given the fact that the recent sensors have been found to be more developed than the older ones, we would prefer opting for the Coolpix P1000.
Lens Comparison
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix P900
Nikon Coolpix P1000
Wide Coverage
24 mm
24 mm
Telezoom
2000 mm
3000 mm
Max aperture at Tele-zoom
F 6.5
F 8.0
Max Wide aperture
F 2.80
F 2.80
As you can easily find out the lens capabilities of the Coolpix P1000, tend to be considerably higher in comparison to the Coolpix P900. The Tele-zoom capabilities and the maximum aperture are the two features that would go in favor of the Coolpix P1000.
Other Features
Apart from the lens and the sensor information that we discussed in detail above, here are the tabulated comparisons between the two cameras for the rest of the features. This will help us get a clear picture of the capabilities of either of the products.
Features/ Particulars
Nikon Coolpix P900
Nikon Coolpix P1000
Optical Zoom
83 X
123 X
Digital Zoom
Yes, available – 133X
Yes, available – 250X
ISO Sensitivity
100 to 6400
100 to 6400
Normal focal range
50 cm
30.48 cm
Macro Focal range
1 cm
1 cm
Focal length
24 to 2000 mm
24 to 3000 mm
Max aperture
F2.8 – f8.0
F2.8 – f6.5
Max Shutter speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec for the movie mode
Built-in Flash
Yes
Yes
Microphone support
No
Yes
Screen
3”- 921,000 dots
3.2”- 921,000 dots
Screen articulation
Yes, swivel
Yes, swivel
Max video resolution
3840×2160 at 25p and 30p
1920×1080 at 60p and 30p
Storage type
SD, SDHC and SDXC
SD, SDHC and SDXC
HDMI connectivity
Yes
Yes
Wireless Connectivity
Yes- Bluetooth and WiFi
Yes – Bluetooth and WiFi
Battery Life
360 shots per charge
250 shots per charge
Except for the battery life, the Coolpix P1000 takes the lead in almost all the aspects to be the preferred camera among the two options.
Features that would make the Coolpix P1000 a good option
Well, the elements that would make Coolpix P1000 can be summed up as
It offers you a better video performance. You can capture 4K videos at 30p as compared to full HD at 60p.
Larger screen at 3.2 inches as opposed to the 3 inches screen
Better telephoto reach
Support for the RAW format – a delight for the professional photographers
The microphone support offers you a better audio recording
Higher optical zoom at 123 X compared to 83 X.
Features That Go in Favour of the Coolpix P900
Not to be left behind, the P900 has a few features in its favor. A few of them can be summarised as
It is more compact than the Coolpix P1000
The camera is comparatively lighter than the P1000
It provides you with better battery life than the P1000. You will have access to 360 shots per charge in comparison to the 250 shots on the P1000.
NFC connectivity available on the P900 can be an added advantage.
The Concluding Thoughts
The decision is clear if you have closely followed the comparison chart outlined above. The Coolpix P1000 provides you with excellent functionality and features that outweigh a few feature advantages offered by the Coolpix P900. In essence, if you are looking for a compact camera with affordable pricing, you can go for the Coolpix P900, else the Coolpix P1000 should be your ideal choice.
Before we look into the Sony IMX519 vs. IMX486 vs. IMX386 vs. IMX586 vs. IMX377, let us first understand the basics.
Exmor is an industry leading technology brand from Sony when it comes to phone cameras systems. Sony implemented this sensor technology in many of their CMOS sensors from their bigger DSLR siblings. So far, there are 4 sensor families produced by Sony, which utilize this Exmor technology. They are as follows:
Exmor Sensors
Exmor R sensors
Exmor RS sensors (Applicable to the current list)
Exmor imaging modules (For different OEM devices)
What is Exmor?
It is a proprietary technology designed and developed by Sony for on-chip analog to digital signal conversion with many step noise reduction which runs parallel on each column of the Exmor CMOS imaging sensor. Exmor R comes with an illuminated back and is one of the first to implement this tech.
Exmor RS, on the other hand, comes with a stacked CMOS image processing sensor first introduced in August of 2012.
Quad Bayer array system on IMX586 48 MP Sensor, Image Source: Sony
As the title implies, we will be talking about Sony IMX519, IMX486, IMX386, IMX586, and the IMX377 camera sensors. Besides comparing various technical details about these sensors, we will also list out and discuss smartphones which utilize these camera sensors. Note that all of these sensors belong to Exmor RS sensor family designed and manufactured by Sony. All Exmor RS family sensors are fundamentally stacked CMOS image sensors.
Sony IMX519 vs. IMX486 vs. IMX386 vs. IMX586 vs. IMX377 – Comparison Table
We hope the article helped you to understand how IMX519 vs. IMX486 vs. IMX386 vs. IMX586 vs. IMX377 differs from each other in the RS product portfolio. For now, there are only limited smartphones featuring the IMX586 sensor. We will keep updating this comparison list as there are new smartphones announced and more details are available.
If you have some discussion points or suggestions, feel free to use the comment box below, or contact us directly. Thank You!
Not all cameras come with the same features. That is precisely what may make it a little tougher to choose the best camera for your requirements. That would indeed be the case especially when you are a newbie in the realm of cameras. Nikon has been one of the clear leaders in the arena of offering a few world class cameras. Two of the best options among the cameras offered by Nikon are Coolpix S3700 and Coolpix S7000. How do they compare against each other? Coolpix S3700 vs Coolpix S7000? We will check out the features and compare them together.
Nikon Coolpix S3700 and Coolpix S7000 – What do they Have in Common?
Well, the cameras do share a few standard features between themselves. It would be interesting to find the exact characteristics of the camera before indulging in understanding the differences.
Both of them come with an excellent Optical Image Stabilization and continuous shooting options. The built-in WiFi connectivity is yet another feature that may make it an excellent choice in its own right. A couple of other features that the siblings share between themselves are the NFC support and internal flash.
Coolpix S3700 vs Coolpix S7000 – How do they differ?
The Coolpix S7000 has been receiving a few rare reviews thanks to a few excellent features that it packs in. However, that should not be something that will put Coolpix S3700 in any inferior segment as such. It has its plus points and competes quite well with the sibling.
The significant difference between the S7000 and S3700 is the megapixel count. The Coolpix S7000 comes with a 16 MP functionality while that on S3700 is 20 MP. Battery backup is yet another feature that S3700 excels in comparison with S7000. It offers 240 shots per charge as compared to the 180 shots provided by the latter. The S7000 scores over the S3700 regarding optical zoom capabilities as it gives you 20x zoom as compared to 8x.
The Nikon Coolpix S3700 is available in a host of colors. The higher image resolution should be one of the features that should make it an ideally an excellent option in its own right. It also offers a lowest ISO range for better performance. The image stabilization and built-in WiFi are the other two options that would put it ahead of the competition in comparison to the Coolpix S7000. Are you into nature photography? If you are someone who has been involved in shooting the flowers and other surprising aspects of nature from close quarters, the Coolpix S3700 should be your prime choice by all standards.
A few other features that would make us choose it for our photography needs is the compact size with a sturdy metal build. The Optical image stabilization ideally makes it one of the excellent options.
What puts Coolpix S7000 ahead of the competition?
The camera packs in a few excellent features that would make the Nikon Coolpix S7000 an attractive option. A better video recording functionality in full HD can turn your videography a superb art in itself. A great deal of video recording and sound recording functionality should be what would make it an excellent choice.
A higher burst speed will offer you faster images. It can be your best option for the faster continuous shooting. 20x optical zoom is ideally best suited for the long-range photography. The S7000 also comes with in-camera panorama options for a higher capability in stitching together multiple photos. It also offers you a brighter shot in the daylight due to the faster shutter speed. A higher extended ISO value should translate into better low light photography performance.
Which One To For?
Well, as we can see from the comparison chart and the discussion we have had above, it is evident that both the Coolpix S7000 and Coolpix S3700 share their strengths and weaknesses. Writing off one in favor of the other may not be easy as both of them do have their exceptional features.
Both the Coolpix S7000 and Coolpix S3700 are indeed great cameras in their own right. They can be worth it in their sphere of performance. If you are someone who often takes close up shots as part of your job or photography assignments, the Coolpix S3700 can be an ideal choice. This can be your best bet in case you are into nature photography.
On the other hand, if you have been looking for the best performance regarding focus and resolution in your shots, the Coolpix S7000 can be the best option. Of course, you may need t sacrifice the high resolution and excellent zoom performance.
The Concluding Thoughts
Well, that was all we have concerning the comparison between the two excellent cameras from Nikon. In fact, there is nothing that would make it any one of the competing siblings good or bad in contrast. The cameras have been made available to cater to the specific requirements, and they do function in the same manner as they are intended to.
We would consider both the cameras excellent performers when it comes to their usability. Your choice should entirely be dependent upon the exact requirements that you may have.
The Nikon is an excellent provider with the world-class cameras under its Coolpix brand. The Coolpix sub-brand is one of the great options if you are looking to check out the bridge cameras. Two most popular cameras in this sub-brand from Nikon are Coolpix P900 and Coolpix P900S. How do they (Coolpix P900 vs P900s) compare with each other? We will find out the differences and similarities in today’s post.
One of the latest ultra-zoom cameras from Nikon, it features the longest optical zoom lens in the world. Some of the advanced features that the camera offers you include a built-in EVF with an eye sensor, a variable angle tilt screen, and a few advanced features. You also have access to a few much in-demand connectivity features like WiFi, GPS, and NFC.
The unique feature that would make it an excellent option is the 83x optical zoom. You have access to the f/2.8 aperture at 24 mm and f/6.5 aperture at 2000 mm. The camera offers you a 5 stop image stabilization. This should be quite ideal for shooting sharper images with the 83x zoom options.
The sensor available on the camera is of 16 MP backlit CMOS capability. The rapid Auto Focus provides you with quicker shooting speeds. It can record full HD videos. The built-in WiFi and NFC options simplify the process of transferring your photos and videos a straightforward affair. The camera does offer a host of scene modes. We liked the moon scene mode that can work wonders for the night shots and the bird watching scene mode. Another feature that makes it a great option is the Movie Creation mode that aids you in creating videos from the images shot in sequence.
The superior features include
16 MP CMOS sensor
3-inch vari-angle screen
83x optical zoom
GPS, WiFi, and NFC connectivity
Multiple scene modes to suit your individual shooting needs.
Macro mode for close-ups
Nikon Coolpix P900S – An Overview
This is an upgrade to Nikon Coolpix P900, and it offers you 24 to 2000 mm ultra high power optical zoom options. Just as you would find on your Coolpix P900, you have access to the 5 stops dual detect optical VR.
It offers you an excellent video shooting performance. The VR functionality on the camera is quite unique enough. The manual focus is best suited for you if you are into bird watching. The camera has almost all the features you may have found on the big brother Coolpix P900. The only missing feature is the lack of GPS. The Birdie mode should ideally be the best bird watchers.
The major features include
16 MP CMOS Sensor
3-inch vari-angle screen
83x optical zoom
WiFi and NFC connectivity options
Macro mode
In essence, both Nikon Coolpix P900 and P900S come with the same features in its entirety. The only difference between the two cameras is the availability of GPS connectivity on the P900 and the lack of it on P900S.
Coolpix P900 vs P900s – Specifications and Comparison Chart
ISO 100 to 1600 under standard conditions
ISO 3200 and 6400 for P, S, A and M modes
Hi1 (ISO 12800) for High ISO
ISO 100 to 1600 under standard conditions
ISO 3200 and 6400 for P, S, A and M modes
Hi1 (ISO 12800) for High ISO
Shutter Mode
Mechanical and CMOS electronic shutter
Mechanical and CMOS electronic shutter
Shutter speed
1/4000 * -1 s
1/4000 * -15 s (for ISO 100 in M mode)
1/4000 * -1 s
1/4000 * -15 s (for ISO 100 in M mode)
USB Connectivity
Micro USB Connector
Micro USB Connector
HDMI Output Connector
Type D Micro Connector
Type D Micro Connector
WiFi connectivity standards
IEEE 802.11b/g/n (standard wireless LAN protocol)
IEEE 802.11b/g/n (standard wireless LAN protocol)
WiFi Range
10 meters
10 meters
Location Data
GPS and GLONASS
Not available
Battery life
360 shots
360 shots
Battery life for shooting
1 hour 20 min
1 hour 20 min
Battery charge time
3 hour 40 min
3 hr 40 min
The above chart should make it clear that the Nikon Coolpix P900 and Coolpix P900S come with same features regarding all the options and functionalities. The only exception you would observe between Coolpix P900 and Coolpix P900S is the GPS connectivity between the two cameras.
The Concluding Thoughts
That was all we have concerning the two competing cameras from Nikon under its Coolpix brand. As you have already found through the comparison charts above, it should be evident to you that the two siblings are precisely equal except for the lack of GPS connectivity on the P900S.
So, it should not ideally be an issue in making a choice. If you want GPS tagging on your shots and videos, go with the P900 and if the feature does not make any difference to you – go with the P900S.
[amazon_link asins=’B01C3LE716′ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’37b58409-9d7f-11e8-8816-d9403b0d69fb’]
[amazon_link asins=’B06Y125DWZ’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’47e9014b-9d7f-11e8-9775-abd086fe7e8a’]
