List of Cameras With Variable Low Pass Filter (AA) – Mirrorless Options

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
List of Cameras With Variable Low Pass Filter (AA) – Mirrorless Options

The low pass filters or the OLPF as it is called in technical terms is one of the essential elements that would make a camera. One of the consistent features that we have observed in the Digital cameras of the days gone by – recent innovations from camera manufacturers has been opting for no low pass filters. Aimed at professional photographers who want the absolute sharpness in their masterpieces, the lack of low pass filters has been fast catching up. However, a few manufacturers have been moving towards variable low pass filters. Let us check out what is a variable low pass filter and which cameras are currently available with the feature enabled.

Also Read: List of Sony Cameras Without Anti-Aliasing Filters

Low Pass Filter – What does it Do?

Before we can move on to understand what is a variable low pass filter, it would be practical enough to give a shot ar knowing more about the actual use of a low pass filter. If you are a pro/enthusiast in photography, you are already aware of what is a low pass filter, but this introduction is for those who are still newbies in the concept.

A low pass filter, also referred to as Anti Aliasing filter is a technique that focusses on removing the Moire effect in your images. This happens typically in case of pictures where you have regular patterns. The patterns get superimposed on one another and produce a messed up look. You may observe the phenomenon when you are watching your TV presenter with checked dresses. The checks on his clothes tend to overlap on one another.

This happens because the sensor can see only red, blue and green pixels, and any of the other colors are interpolated concerning the adjoining pixels. Low pass filters are used with the aim of minimizing the effect of these Moire effects and artifacts.

What is a Low Pass Filter?

The low pass filter comes with three layers. The top layer displaces the image in a horizontal direction slightly. The middle layer acts as a means to remove the unwanted infrared radiations from your picture. The third layer displaces the image somewhat in the vertical direction. This will eliminate the Moire effect, but n turn slightly blur the image.

However, with the recent launch of cameras that come with high-resolution sensors, you would not need low pass filters as they do not produce noticeable Moire effects. Moreover, the professional photographers who are into landscapes and similar genres want a better sharpness in their images. In fact, landscapes have irregular patterns and as such would not be affected by Moire effects or artifacts.

The Cameras with Variable Low pass Filters

Well, we have seen cameras with low pass filters, a few without the low pass filters and now the trend changes with innovation in the arena of low pass filters.

We have seen why professional photographers detest anti-aliasing filters and have a keen eye on the sharpness of their images. However, there are a few who typically work in studio environments and need a low pass filter. From that perspective, a few manufacturers have been into opting for two models when launching new models – one with the low pass filter and the other without the filter. However, Sony seems to have understood the futility of such exercises and has been trying to incorporate the two options within a single model with a variable low pass filter.

The Sony RX1R II – The first to Introduce Variable Low pass filter

Check on Amazon

As things stand now, the Sony RX1R II is the only digital camera to feature a variable low pass filter. The camera features the low pass filter as required for those working with regular patterns and studio environments, it provides the control of whether they want the low pass filter or not depending upon their subject.

This is the first time that the variable low pass filter has been introduced on a digital camera. You would be able to adjust the balance for image resolution manually and takes care of the Moire effects.

The Low pass filter comes with the three standards – High, Standard and Off. Understandably enough, the off position would be equivalent to having no low pass filter. This should be the best for the situations where resolution is a priority. The Standard option will help you strike the right balance between the resolution and the Moire effect if any. Finally, the high mode will emphasize the reduction of Moire effect and would be equivalent to having a full-fledged Low pass filter.

Other Features in Sony RX1R II

Apart from the variable low pass filter, the Sony RX1R II does come with a host of other features as well. Joining the family of full-frame compact digital cameras along with the Sony RX1 and RX1R, the Sony RX1R II comes with a high resolution at 42.4 MP.

Moreover, you also have a 30 percent improvement in autofocus functionality. There are several optimizations seen in response to autofocus speeds. The camera offers ISO sensitivity of 100 to 25600 that can be expanded too up to 50 to 102400.

A few salient features that the camera offers you include

  • 35 mm F2.0 ZEISS Sonnar T* lens with macro capability
  • Faster hybrid autofocus with 399 AAF points.
  • The XGA OLED Tru-Finder EVF with 2.4 million dots
  • The 3 inch LCD that has tilt functionality for an easier maneuver
  • Smartphone connectivity through NFC and WiFi.

The Parting Thoughts

The debate on whether you need a low pass filter on your digital camera or not is a never-ending battle. There are equally strong arguments in favor of either of the options. In any case, a new concept in the form of a variable low pass filter should indeed be the best you can go with. In essence, we would suppose this will put an end to the arguments.

List of Sony Cameras Without Anti-Aliasing Filters (Low Pass Pros & Cons)

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
List of Sony Cameras Without Anti-Aliasing Filters (Low Pass Pros & Cons)

The low pass filters have long been used on DSLR cameras. As photography professionals may be aware of, the primary purpose of using a low pass filter is avoiding the Moire effect. However, recent launches from prominent camera manufacturers like Nikon have been found to have no low pass filters. If you are a Sony fan and looking forward to a Sony camera with no low pass filter, we will help you find the best options currently available. The Ultimate Guide to Sony Cameras Without Anti-Aliasing Filters | LensXP.com

A Definitive Analysis of Sony Cameras Without Anti-Aliasing Filters

Updated to August 2025 | The ultimate guide to sharpness, moiré, and making the right choice.

The Optical Low-Pass Filter: A Primer

The pursuit of ultimate image fidelity in digital photography is a complex endeavor. Central to this is the optical low-pass filter (OLPF), also known as an anti-aliasing (AA) filter. Understanding its function is critical to appreciating why its inclusion or omission is a defining characteristic of a modern digital camera's design philosophy.

Infographic: How an Anti-Aliasing Filter Works

The filter introduces a minute, controlled blur to prevent digital artifacts like moiré.

Without AA Filter (Max Sharpness)

Lens Sensor Crisp, single point of light

With AA Filter (Moiré Prevention)

Lens AA Filter Sensor Light is slightly diffused

Digital Aliasing and Moiré

Digital camera sensors are composed of a finite grid of pixels. Aliasing occurs when a fine, repeating pattern in the scene exceeds the sensor's ability to resolve it accurately. The most common visual manifestations are moiré (distracting, wavy patterns) and false color. These artifacts are embedded into the raw data, making them exceedingly difficult to remove in post-production.

The Shift to Filterless: A Brief History

In the early days of digital photography, sensors had low resolutions (3-6 megapixels). Their large pixels made them highly susceptible to aliasing, so a strong AA filter was essential. The trend towards removing these filters was driven by two key advancements:

Soaring Sensor Resolutions

As sensor resolutions jumped from 24MP to over 60MP, the distance between pixels (pixel pitch) shrank. This allows the sensor to resolve finer patterns natively, reducing the fundamental need for an OLPF to prevent aliasing.

Smarter Image Processors

Modern processors like Sony's BIONZ XR can execute sophisticated algorithms to reconstruct a full-color image. This enhanced processing helps interpret fine details and suppress artifacts, further lessening the reliance on a physical filter.

This shift reflects a calculated decision: to trade the guaranteed safety of a physical filter for the potential of capturing the absolute maximum detail the lens and sensor are capable of resolving.

The Pursuit of Ultimate Sharpness: Analyzing the Trade-Off

Omitting the anti-aliasing filter is a deliberate engineering choice that prioritizes ultimate image sharpness above all else. This choice presents photographers with a distinct trade-off: unparalleled detail rendering in exchange for an increased risk of specific digital artifacts.

The Benefit: Maximizing Sharpness

By removing the optical element responsible for introducing a slight blur, the sensor captures the full, unfiltered information projected by the lens. This results in images that exhibit superior micro-contrast and resolve finer textures, appearing crisper and more detailed. This is invaluable for landscape and architectural photography.

The Risk: Moiré and False Color

Without the filter, a sensor is more susceptible to generating moiré and false color when encountering problematic subjects, like certain fabrics or architectural grilles. These artifacts are written into the raw file and can be very difficult to correct in post-production, especially in video.

Infographic: How Sensor Resolution Mitigates Moiré

Higher resolution sensors have a higher sampling frequency, allowing them to resolve fine patterns that would cause moiré on lower resolution sensors.

Lower Resolution Sensor

Fewer pixels can't accurately sample the fine pattern, causing interference (moiré).

${Array(25).fill(0).map(() => `
`).join('')}
MOIRÉ

Higher Resolution Sensor

More, smaller pixels can accurately sample the fine pattern, resolving it correctly.

${Array(100).fill(0).map(() => `
`).join('')}
SHARP

The Comprehensive Guide to Sony's Filterless Camera Lineup

Sony's approach to implementing filterless sensor designs is strategic, tied to the camera's intended purpose, sensor resolution, and target audience. Here is the definitive list, updated to August 2025.

Chart: Resolution of Filterless Sony Cameras

Filter by:
Sensor Type
Release Status
Camera Model Resolution AA Filter Status Release Status Purchase
Full-Frame
Sony α1 II 50.1 MP None Current
Check on Amazon Check on Newegg
Sony α1 50.1 MP None Current
Check on Amazon Check on Newegg
Sony α7R V 61 MP None Current
Check on Amazon Check on Newegg
Sony α7R IV 61 MP None Current
Check on Amazon Check on Newegg
Sony α7R III 42 MP None Current
Check on Amazon Check on Newegg
Sony α7CR 61 MP None Current
Check on Amazon Check on Newegg
Sony α7R II 42 MP None Discontinued
Sony α7R 36 MP None Discontinued
Sony α7 IV 33 MP Debated (Present) Current
Sony α7 III 24 MP Debated (Weak Present) Current
APS-C
Sony ZV-E10 II 26 MP None Current
Compact
Sony RX1R III 61 MP None Announced
Sony RX1R 24.3 MP None Discontinued

Note: Table shows a curated list. Models with confirmed strong AA filters (e.g., α7S series) are omitted for clarity.

Chart: Release Timeline of Key Models

The Ambiguous Cases: An Expert Analysis

While many Sony models have a clear-cut filter status, a few popular cameras have been the subject of considerable debate. This confusion arises from Sony's nuanced approach in its mainstream models, balancing sharpness with artifact suppression.

The Sony α7 III: Weak Filter by Design

The 24MP α7 III is one of the best-selling full-frame cameras ever. While incredibly sharp for its resolution, detailed analysis and user reports confirm it has an intentionally weak anti-aliasing filter. This was a calculated compromise by Sony to enhance perceptual sharpness for its most popular all-around camera while retaining a degree of protection against the most severe moiré.

The Sony α7 IV: The Center of the Debate

The 33MP α7 IV generated even more confusion. Its higher resolution puts it in a "borderline" category. However, authoritative technical reviews and direct comparative tests conclude that the Sony α7 IV does have an optical low-pass filter. The confusion is a testament to the filter's optimized, weak design and the camera's excellent sharpness. Sony's decision indicates a strategic choice to prioritize reliability for the broadest user base, including wedding and event shooters who cannot risk moiré.

Contextual Analysis: Why Some Sony Cameras Still Have Filters

Understanding which cameras lack a filter is only half the story. Sony's decision to include a filter in other models is equally deliberate and reveals a clear, use-case-driven strategy. For certain applications, preventing moiré is a higher priority than absolute sharpness.

The 'S' (Sensitivity) Series

Models like the α7S III are designed for low-light and video. Their 12MP sensors have large pixels, making them prone to aliasing. To produce clean, artifact-free video, these cameras are equipped with a strong and effective AA filter.

The Cinema Line (FX Series)

For professional filmmaking with cameras like the FX3 and FX2, reliability is non-negotiable. Moiré in a moving clip can render a shot unusable. Consequently, these cameras are designed with AA filters as a standard feature to meet the rigorous demands of production environments.

Practical Application: Genre-Specific Recommendations

The choice between a camera with or without an anti-aliasing filter has significant implications for different photographic and videographic disciplines. The optimal choice depends entirely on your primary subjects and final output requirements.

Landscape & Architectural Photography

Recommendation: Filterless (e.g., α7R V, α7CR). These genres are the primary beneficiaries of filterless designs. The ability to capture maximum detail is crucial for large prints and rendering fine textures. However, be mindful of moiré on architectural elements like brickwork and grilles.

Portrait, Fashion & Wedding Photography

Recommendation: High-Risk, High-Reward (e.g., α1, α7R V). The increased sharpness can be breathtaking on skin texture and fabrics. However, the risk of moiré on clothing (tweed, herringbone, fine patterns) is a significant concern. A filterless camera demands more careful composition and readiness to manage artifacts.

Videography & Filmmaking

Recommendation: Use a camera WITH a filter (e.g., α7S III, FX series). For professional video work, reliability is paramount. Moiré in a moving shot is highly distracting and can ruin a take. It is nearly impossible to fix in post. A camera with a confirmed AA filter is the safer, more professional choice.

A Practitioner's Guide to Moiré Mitigation

For those who choose the exceptional sharpness of a filterless camera, managing the risk of moiré is an essential skill. Prevention is always better than a cure, and the most effective way to deal with moiré is to prevent it from being recorded in the first place.

In-Camera Prevention Techniques

  • Adjust Aperture: Stopping down the lens to a smaller aperture, such as f/8 or f/11, introduces a natural softening effect known as diffraction. This can function as a weak OLPF, often reducing or eliminating moiré at the expense of a marginal loss in critical sharpness.
  • Change Distance: Moiré is highly dependent on how a pattern is projected onto the sensor. Simply moving slightly closer to or farther from the subject changes this projection, which can often break the interference and resolve the issue.
  • Alter the Shooting Angle: A small change in perspective can be highly effective. Instead of shooting a patterned surface straight-on, try tilting the camera slightly. This changes the angle of the intersecting patterns and can eliminate the moiré effect.
  • Use Burst Mode or Adjust Focus Minutely: Since moiré is sensitive to the exact point of focus, capturing a burst of frames while making tiny adjustments to the focus can yield some images where the artifact is less pronounced or absent entirely.

Post-Production Removal Workflows

When moiré is unavoidable, tools in Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop can help. The Adjustment Brush in Lightroom has a dedicated Moiré slider that can desaturate the false color patterns. In Photoshop, more advanced techniques like localized blurring or Frequency Separation offer greater control, but all post-production fixes are a compromise.

Conclusion: A Deliberate and Segmented Strategy

Sony's strategic use of the anti-aliasing filter across its camera lineup reveals a sophisticated, multi-tiered approach to product design tailored to specific user needs. The analysis up to August 2025 demonstrates a clear and consistent philosophy: the omission of the AA filter is reserved for cameras where the pursuit of maximum still image resolution is the paramount objective.

This is most evident in the high-resolution "R" series (α7R, α7CR) and the flagship "1" series (α1, α1 II), where the filterless design is a core feature. The "R" moniker in a Sony camera's name has become a reliable shorthand for this design choice. Conversely, Sony's decision to retain the AA filter is equally deliberate, particularly for cameras with a primary focus on video, such as the "S" series and the professional Cinema Line, where artifact-free reliability is non-negotiable.

For the consumer, this segmentation provides a clear, albeit nuanced, choice. Photographers in disciplines like landscape and architecture are well-served by the filterless models. Videographers and hybrid shooters who prioritize reliability should gravitate towards models with a confirmed AA filter. Ultimately, the choice rests on a clear understanding of the trade-off between absolute detail and digital purity.

LensXP.com

© 2025 LensXP.com. All Rights Reserved. Your expert source for lens and camera analysis.

Also Read: Optical Low Pass Filter vs No Low Pass Filter – What’s The Difference?

What is Low Pass Filter?

The Low pass filter is also known as Anti Aliasing filter or AA filter in the photography circles. The filter is known technically as OPLF or Optical Low Pass Filter. It is placed over the sensor and helps you control the aliasing.

What exactly is aliasing?  The artifacts or the Moire effects that you observe when shooting fine grid of pixels. This should be evident when you are photo shooting a person wearing fabric that has fine textured clothe. This would happen because each pixel on your sensor would see only red, blue or green colors. Rest of the colors are interpolated with the data from the neighboring pixels. This phenomenon of demosaicing introduces what is known as Moir effect.

The AA filter or low pass filter as it is generally known as typically consists of three layers. The top layer displaces the image slightly horizontally, the second layer filters out the unneeded infrared radiation and the bottom layer displaces the image slightly vertically. Thus the high frequencies in the picture are blurred, and the Moire effect is reduced. However, the use of AA filter also has an adverse impact as well – it reduces the sharpness of your image.

Why are Low Pass Filters are Done Away With?

Well, the low pass filters are quite helpful in reducing the Moire effect, but your images tend to blur. This would reduce the sharpness of your pictures to a considerable extent. Professional photographers consider the lack of sharpness a substantial issue.

If you are a landscape photographer, you would be unimpressed with the high degree of loss in sharpness. The landscapes come with irregular patterns; there are lesser chances of aliasing or Moire effect affecting them. That would necessarily make the filter fewer cameras the best option for the landscape photographers. They would help bring out the better landscape details and a more elegant definition of the objects.

Moreover, higher pixel density would mean you would experience low or no Moire effects or artifacts. Today’s DSLR cameras come with a higher megapixels count and thus would not ideally be affected by the Moire effect.

Are There any Sony cameras without Anti Aliasing filter?

Well, the trend of opting for no anti-aliasing filter started with Nikon’s D800E. Realizing the success of the camera and the benefits offered by the lack of AA filters, Nikon came up with a portfolio of cameras without the low pass filters.

Following suit, even other camera manufacturers followed the trend and launched cameras with higher pixel density and no low pass filter. Sony is not an exception either. It can be considered to be a late entrant in the no anti-aliasing arena with its A7 mirrorless range of cameras. The first Sony camera to offer no low pass filter is the Sony A7R II. The manufacturer followed it up with the latest launch of the company – the Sony RX1R.

1. Sony A7R II

Check on Amazon

The Sony A7R II is probably the world’s first full-frame back-illuminated camera with CMOS sensor. The camera comes with the 35 mm Exmor sensor and a sensor resolution of 42.4 MP.

Some of the features worthy of mentioning would include

  • An excellent image quality
  • Faster burst shooting speeds
  • A high-quality 4K shooting mode
  • High-end customization options

The Pros

  • Proven quality of 42.4 MP sensor
  • Dual card slot functionality to improve storage requirements
  • 10 fps image capturing capability

The Cons

  • Lack of built-in flash
  • No choice for XQD card slot

2. Sony RX1R

Check on Amazon

Interestingly Sony has launched two versions of the new full frame camera – the RX1 comes with the low pass filter, while the Sony Rx1R comes with no low pass filter. Sony does not want to disappoint either of its customer bases.

Some of the excellent features packed in include

  • A complete resolution without the anti-aliasing filter
  • Incredible image quality from the compact camera.
  • A wider sensitivity range of ISO 100 to 25600. This ensures the best low light performance
  • The ergonomic design to make handling your camera a great experience.
  • Options for 14-bit RAW format shooting.

The Pros

  • Shooting options in silent mode
  • Sharper and detailed images
  • Fastest ever autofocus functionality
  • Amazing picture quality.

The Cons

  • Low pass filter would cause Moire effect
  • The fixed length may limit shooting flexibility
  • Expensive compared to similar options from other manufacturers.

The Concluding Thoughts

Well, those were a few options available among the Sony cameras with the lack of anti-aliasing functionality. Sony is one of the latest entrants in the realm enthusiast focussed cameras without the low pass filters or anti-aliasing filters and possibly testing the waters with these two launches.

However, we would expect the future generations of Sony cameras to come with no anti-aliasing feature. If they do not entirely ditch the AA filter, we may see dual launches, at least on some major products, as has already been witnessed with the Sony RX1 and RX1R.

Have you used any of those two Sony products without the low pass filter option? In case you have checked out either of them, do share your opinions with us. Also, share your views on the positive or negative effects of ditching the low pass filter or the anti-aliasing filter.

List of Canon EOS R Adapters From Canon For Lens Compatibility

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
List of Canon EOS R Adapters From Canon For Lens Compatibility

Canon has been a well-known manufacturer when it comes to digital cameras and their associated lense ecosystem. The company recently launched the Canon EOS R camera with a few excellent features packed in. However, there is a catch here. The Canon EOS R camera comes with an RF mount for the lenses. If you have an existing Canon DSLR, or more so a Canon EOS R range of mirrorless DSLRs, you would find that the lens mounts on the EOS DSLRs would primarily be using EF mount design. What would you do with your current field of lenses that you bought for your Canon EOS DSLR? Do not fret – along with the Canon EOS R; the company has also launched a range of Canon EOS R adapters. The adapter range should help you make use of your existing lenses with your all new Canon EOS R.

The Canon EOS R Adapters

If you have been using the Canon EOS DSLRs before, you will find them to have the EF-S mount for the cropped sensors. The EF-S lenses were designed specifically for the Canon DSLRs with the APS-C sensors. The Canon EOS R, on the other hand, offers an RF mount.

However, Canon has not left the 150 million users who have adapted themselves to the EF and EF-S lenses in the lurk. Along with the Canon EOS R, a full frame mirrorless camera with the RF mount, they have also released a set of three RF to EF mount adapters. You should be able to use your existing EF and EF-S lenses with your Canon EOS R or any other upcoming camera with the RF mount.

The Features that The EOS R adapters Come with

Well, the Canon EOS R System adapters have been designed for use on any of the existing Canon EF and EF-S lenses. They are fully compatible with the lenses and the newly announced EOS R camera system and should offer you an excellent service concerning the functionality.

In essence, these Canon EOS R System adapters should let you use your existing compatible Canon lenses easily with your new camera. The adapters would also help you use them with any camera that would be launched in future with the RF mount.

A few features that we liked with these adapters would be

Excellent Compatibility

The EOS R System adapters should be completely compatible with a range of Canon lenses. They should work with almost all major EF and EF-S lenses. So, if you have a Canon EOS DSLRs, or the compatible lenses, you would be able to use all of them can be used with your new camera.

The lenses compatible with the Canon EOS R system adapters include

If you have a look at those numbers (we will not go into the detailed list, as it would constitute another separate article), you will find that quite a vast range of lenses are supported.

Durability

The EOS R adapters from Canon have been designed with a ruggedized design for you to put to use. Built for effective professional usage, they come with a metal mount on front and back. The fact that they are designed for all weather conditions as they come with weather sealing.

Excellent Engineering technology

You can be assured of excellent build quality with the Canon EOS R system adapters. They are aesthetic, easy to use and offer you a great deal of compatibility. You can experience a great deal of engineering excellence with the Canon EOS R adapters.

The List of Canon EOS R Adapters

Mirrorless cameras have been blessed with the mount adapters since long. However, it is quite heartening to find that Canon has been thinking about its existing users and launched the mount adapters for the current range of lenses (of course, the number of those lenses is indeed overwhelming as you have already found out above).

Canon has come up with three EOS R System adapters for use with your existing range of Canon EF and EF-S lenses. Let us examine each of them in finer detail.

1. Drop-In Filter Mount Adapter EF-EOS R

For Circular Polarizing Filter Check on Amazon

One of the best options to use with your EOS R camera or any future RF mount camera, this should be one of the best to use drop-in filters. The adapter is available in two alternative options.

You can either opt for the adapter with the circular polarising filter or a variable ND filter. You would no longer need to fit the filters to the front of the lens anymore. And yes, you can also opt for clear filters if you are looking to shoot without the use of filters.

The variable ND functionality will be helpful in controlling the light entering the sensor. If you are a landscape photographer, you would indeed love the feature. If you are into shooting colorful imagery, the adapter with the circular polarising filter should work best for your needs.

A few features include

  • Compatibility with EOS camera so that you can use any EF and EF-S lens with your camera.
  • Complete weather sealing functionality with dust and water resistance
  • Metal mounts on either side will offer you the high-end flexibility.
  • Choose the right filter option to suit your photography style. Go with the circular filter for those colorful images and the variable ND filter for the best landscape shots.

If you are looking for mounts with a variable filter – Check on Amazon

2. Mount Adapter EF-EOS R

For Standard Adapter: Check on Amazon

The standard adapter for EOS R camera RF mount, it has a simple functionality and works towards providing an optimum solution for the best experience regarding allowing your EF lenses to your new Canon EOS R camera.

You can be confident of your existing EF lenses working seamlessly with the Canon EOS R. Since the EOS R camera does not come with a mirror box, you may need to move the EF lenses away from the sensor. There are no additional elements included within the mount adapter. So, you can be confident of better image quality without having to worry about the degradation of any nature.

A few features that the mount adapter offers you include

  • A perfect exterior design matching the EF lenses
  • Weather sealing that provides excellent protection against the dust and water.
  • High-end flexibility with the metal mount on both front and back.
  • It is a necessary adapter, and if you are looking for basic functionality, this should be your best bet

3. Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R

Canon Control Ring Mount Adapter EF-EOS R

Check on Amazon

This is yet another option provided by Canon for the best compatibility of your Canon EF and EF-S lenses on your Canon EOS R cameras. The mount will offer you a choice for a customizable user functionality for EF Lenses and its compatibility with the EOS R camera.

The presence of the control ring would help you have access to a host of customizations options on the go. You can assign a host of functionalities to your control ring. Some of those functions include exposure compensation, ISO, aperture or shutter speed. In essence, the adapter system would help you opt for the control ring functionality on the EF lenses as well, just the way you would be using the feature on your RF lenses.

You need not take your eye off from the camera for accessing the control ring. The ergonomic placement of the ring will help you get the most out of your adapter. The tactile feedback available on the control ring should be quite intuitive enough.

A few features that the adapter comes with can be summed up as

  • An excellent control ring functionality
  • High-end customization options for your EF lenses.
  • The external design matches the EF lenses
  • Weather sealing with dust and water protection helping you use the adapter in any conditions.
  • A rugged flexibility option for years of trouble-free operation.

The Concluding Thoughts

Those were the three (Plus one!) capable and compatible EOS R adapters for your Canon EOS R camera. You can expect a few other third-party adapters being available in the days to come, but for the time being, we have focussed on the system adapters coming from Canon themselves. They understand their products well, and we thought you would end up with the best performance with the in-house mount adapters from Canon.

Have you used any of these adapters for your Canon EOS R camera? If you have, do share your thoughts and experiences with us.

Optical Low Pass Filter vs No Low Pass Filter – What’s The Difference?

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
Optical Low Pass Filter vs No Low Pass Filter – What’s The Difference?

If you are a professional photographer, you would understand the effects and trade-offs involved in opting for a low pass filter. However, if you are still confused, let us check out whether you need low pass filter or choose for lack of it. Let us understand the reason for opting for an Optical Low Pass Filter vs No Low Pass Filter and what issues does it solve.

Also Read: Best Nikon DSLRs without Low Pass Filter

The Moire Effect

Source: Wikipedia

A host of digital camera sensors opt for “Bayer pattern.” These sensors employ a 2×2 pattern in a mosaic pattern. These contain one red, one blue and two green sensors. The same pattern is repeated for creating multiple sensors of different shapes, sizes and megapixel counts. While producing images, the sensor makes use of what is called demosaicing.

This creates a Moire effect and digital artifacts. What exactly is the Impact of Moire? Well, it is something you may have noticed when watching your older TV. When your presenter on your TV is wearing a striped dress, you will see that there would be a mismatch or overlapping of the colors. If you have been toiling on a tar road on the hot sunny afternoon, you will notice the same kind of effect when you look at the far away portion of the line of sight. To understand it still better, take a snap of your laptop or PC screen using your smartphone camera. Did you notice those colored lines? That is precisely what we technically refer to as Moire effect. The effect is also referred to as Aliasing. It is necessarily a phenomenon where the reproduced image produces false colors.

An Optical low Pass filter – A Solution to Moire Effect

The Optical low pass filter is the perfect answer to the Moire effect. The low pass filter or Anti-aliasing filter would reduce the impact of false colors.

How does it work? Well, it works through a simple procedure. Camera manufacturers employ an optical filter for the purpose. The filter is used on top of the sensor and comes with three layers. The first layer would displace the image slightly in a horizontal direction. The second layer used in the filter would be used for filtering the infrared radiation. The third layer replaces the sample image slightly vertically.

All these effects together would remove the effects of aliasing and Moire effects. However, do note that these changes can affect the image resolution. Your image will be blurred, and as we are well aware of, no one likes blurred images – right?

The No Low Pass Filter revolution

Camera manufacturers have been using the anti-aliasing filters or the blur filters since long to do away the false colors. However, the lack of details is what would make it an unwanted evil in most cases.

That is precisely what would explain the decision of a few camera manufacturers to opt for no low pass filters. On the forefront of this revolution is Nikon, which introduced the concept of no low pass filter way back in 2004. How and why would they do it?

While anti-aliasing is one of the features that would appear to be an excellent option under a few conditions, it remains an evil by no means. Why? Because the pictures get blurred and there is a considerable loss of resolution.

The functionality is quite an efficient one, but if you are someone involved in the landscape photography – you will find that the lack of sharpness is a significant concern. You are not affected by the Moire effect or the false colors, but with the option available by default on your camera you will end up with the lack of details. Nikon introduced the Nikon D800E with no low pass filter keeping the landscape photographers in mind.

How Does No Low Pass Filter work?

Source: aegis-elec

As you would think a no low pass filter camera does not have the filter and that does it – you are wrong. A no low pass filter cannot be done away within a camera. At least, Nikon does not follow it.

Whether a camera manufacturer is opting for anti-aliasing or not, they need to choose for filtering the infrared radiation. That is where Nikon makes use of a particular filter just the way the low pass filters are used in conventional camera sensors.

Again, it offers you a filter with three layers. The first layer would displace the image vertically by a slight margin as in the case of AA filters, the second layer filters the infrared radiation, and the third layer would cause a vertical displacement. But since the third layer is reversed, it would negate the effect of the first layer. You will end up with no loss of sharpness.

Which One Should You opt for?

Well, that is a debate that has been around for over a decade now. Some purists do not want any loss of resolution. For them, the lack of clarity due to a low pass filter is a definite no go.

However, some people would support both the camps. They have their reasons for going in for the low pass filter or against it. Lack of resolutions and sharpness can be considerable concern in advertising and landscapes. Of course, you would face a few issues like Moire and false colors. But, they can be corrected through the post-production processing. If you are a medium level shooter, a high degree of post-production may be a big issue.

The perfect choice would be dependent upon what exactly you are looking ahead to and which genre of photographers do you belong to. The new breed of camera users has, however, been focussing on opting for a better resolution than worrying about the Moire effect. Access to more natural photo processing tools and high-resolution sensors have considerably addressed and minimized the issue of false colors and Moire issues.

The Parting Thoughts

The focus is shifting towards no low pass filters, and though the numbers are quite little as of now, we would indeed expect a vast amount of people supporting the higher resolution. However, the right choice for you would be utterly dependent upon your preferences. Choose the camera that offers you the right feature for your taste and style of photography.

List of Nikon DSLR Cameras Without Low Pass Filter (Anti-aliasing Filter)

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
List of Nikon DSLR Cameras Without Low Pass Filter (Anti-aliasing Filter)

Before we dive into Nikon DSLR Cameras Without Low Pass Filter, let us understand why it is important, before making the final decision.

If you have an older DSLR camera, you would be aware of the issues with Moire effect or interference. If you were to take a photograph with those cameras you would often encounter regular patterns – you would notice the interference. This is precisely what Low Pass Filters would be able to address. What is the Low pass filter and how does it work? Let us check out in today’s post.

What is the Moire Effect?

Source: Wikipedia

To understand the Moire effect, you need to remember those images you used to get on those older TV sets. Whenever you had a presenter with a striped dress, you would find odd stripes and patterns as if they are overlapping. Something akin to the mirage effect you would see on the roads in hot weather.

You would also be able to find the same patterns when you take snaps of your laptop or computer screen with your mobile phone camera. This kind of effect is typically caused when the subtle patterns on your subject mesh well with the model on your imaging chip on your camera. This will create a separate profile in addition to the original pattern.

What Causes the Moire effect?

Well, one of the reasons that would cause Moire effect would be the one we specified here – the rectangular grids and patterns. However, that alone may not be the sole cause of the problem.

The color filter arrays placed on the lenses can also cause the Moire effect in many cases. It can happen if you are using a super sharp lens as well. The conventional sensor can detect only three kinds of pixels – red, green and blue. Rest of the colors are obtained with an interpolation of the neighboring colors. Generally referred to as demosaicing, this process adds more color Moire to the images.

Camera manufacturers began using the low pass filters to handle this issue. However, of late, most of the cameras have stopped opting for low pass filters. More on that later.

What is a Low Pass Filter?

A Low Pass Filter is also known as an anti-aliasing filter. In some contexts, it also referred to as a blur filter. This is specifically designed for eliminating the effects of the Moire effect. This is done to blur the images that reach the sensor. Of course, it may result in a loss of details – but works effectively in eliminating the Moire effects. It was one of the most commonly used options on cameras designed for day to day photography users.

The OLPF or Optical low pass filter is placed on top of the image sensor, and this reduces aliasing effects. The AA or Anti Aliasing filter comes with three layers. The top layer displaces the image a little horizontally. The middle layer has an infrared filter and is used to remove the unwanted infrared radiation. The bottom layer would replace the model slightly vertically.

The effect of the Optical low pass filter would be to blur the high frequencies of the image while allowing the low frequencies. This would be helpful to remove the Moire and artifacts effectively. However, it will introduce blur in your pictures.

Why Is Low Pass Filter Done Away With?

Well, aliasing is a huge problem. That is precisely why camera manufacturers opt for anti-aliasing or low pass filters.

However, what about the landscape photographers? They do not suffer from issues like Moire effect or other problems. But, unnecessarily, they would need to suffer from the blurring introduced by low pass filters. That is why camera manufacturers started removing the low pass filter. Of course, these cameras do produce Moire effect, but it would be up to the photographers to decide how would they want to deal with it. They can opt for any alternative options or correct the issue in post-processing.

Nikon started the trend of no low pass filter with its Nikon D800E. Later on, they launched a host of cameras with the lack of low pass filters. As of now, the trend has taken off, and lack of no pass filter has become a decisive factor in a DSLR camera.

How Is Low Pass Filter removed?

In a traditional low pass filter, the light rays are moved through the three layers of the filter as indicated in the above description of low pass filter. Thus it is split thrice and removes the Moire effect, but introduces blur effects.

In case of Nikon’s D800E, it takes a slightly different approach. There is no option to remove the complete low pass filter as the camera would need to reflect infrared radiation. Of course, they would have been able to make use of only one layer, but to avoid moving the focal plane – Nikon employed the same three-layer strategy, but the first and last layers cancel each other. The light passes through the first layer (the vertical low pass filter) and splits into two. Then it moves through the infrared filter and finally steps through the next vertical low pass filter. Since the last filter is a reversed vertical low pass filter, you would find it converging back into one line. Instead of blurred images as in the case of a low pass filter, you would not get such issues with the new technology.

How does it Negate aliasing?

Opting for the lack of optical low pass filter can result in Moire effects. However, you can choose for post-processing to address the concern.

In any case, the modern day cameras come with quite high-resolution sensors. The high resolution would translate into a smaller pixel pitch. This can go a long way in reducing the effect of Moire or false colors. The high-resolution cameras would indeed need no optical low pass filter. They offer the advantage of increased image sharpness coupled with the lack of aliasing.

The Concluding Thoughts

Well, those were the complete details about the optical low pass filter used in cameras and the effects that they would produce. If you are using a modern camera with a high-resolution sensor, you can be okay with the lack of a low pass filter.

If you wanted to share your thoughts with us on the low pass filter and its possible usage patterns, it would go a long way in helping us know more about the technology.

The Low pass filters have long been used on digital cameras. The primary function of the filter would be the removal of interference caused while shooting finer and regular patterns. However, with the current breed of new age sensors, most of the situations do not produce this Moire effect. That is precisely why recent camera launches do not have the low pass filter options included.

What is a Low Pass Filter from Nikon’s Perspective

The Optical Low Pass Filter (or OLPF) is also referred to as Anti-Aliasing filter (generally applies to as AA filter). This covers the image sensor and helps avoid the Moire effect observed with the regular patterns. The filter would essentially allow the lower frequencies while blocking the high frequencies to pass through.

In essence, the low pass filter will blur the image slightly to remove the Moire or interference. The camera software later applies an extra sharpening to mask this slight blurring. A low-class filter would come with a top layer that displaces the image slightly in the horizontal plane, an infrared layer that filters out the infrared radiation and a bottom layer that replaces the image slightly vertically.

What is their significance? Well, for years together – the low pass filters have been a constant phenomenon among the cameras. However, Nikon changed all that with its D800E which came with no low pass filter. The images were finer regarding details. Nikon claimed that the sensors an excellent pixel pitch so that there would be practically no Moire effect. This began the trend for the launch of cameras without the low pass filter making it one of the prominent features NOT to have a low pass filter.

Nikon DSLR Cameras Without Low Pass Filter

It was Nikon that began the trend of no low pass filter cameras with the launch of Nikon D800E. They currently have a good deal of cameras without the low pass filters. Let us check out a few of them in today’s post.

Also Read: Nikon D3500 vs D3400 DSLR

1. Nikon D7200

Check on Amazon

A series that takes the tradition of the older D70 launched back in 2004. One of the excellent mid-range cameras, it boasts of a few outstanding features including but not limited to a superior autofocus system, a weather sealed body and high-end image quality.

Some of the features apart from the lack of low pass filter can be summed up as

  • A robust autofocus functionality that would lock in fast moving objects quicker. The 51 point autofocus system would cover an entire sensor.
  • Dual SD card slots would provide you with a great deal of storage. This can be used for multiple purposes. Save RAW and JPG images in their respective cards, use it as a clone card for backup purposes, or as an overflow card
  • An excellent battery backup that would provide you with a whopping 1100 images per charge should make it best for all occasions.
  • Excellent connectivity with the Nikon’s app through your mobile data.

Price – [amazon_link asins=’B01DKT9Y5O’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’a8c05527-c24c-11e8-b9b8-7d654cefd6ee’]

2. Nikon D5500

Check on Amazon

Opting for a decent entry-level DSLR may not be an easy task. There are practically hundreds of options that may be offering you the best of the features. Possibly, the Nikon D5500 should ideally quench your thirst for the best.

An excellent noise reduction capability and a decent 24.2 MP sensor should make it an ideal option for the photographer inside you.

A few salient features of the camera would include

  • The touchscreen display would make it best suited for use in the new digital age photography.
  • A most capable WiFi and smartphone compatibility.
  • Quite small and lightweight, the camera is designed to stay with you always. One of the best options for the rough weather and rougher handling
  • Autofocus functionality that is quicker and accurate helps you shoot your moving objects quite easily
  • One of the best opportunities for cinematic storytelling.

Price – [amazon_link asins=’B00RUBJKU8′ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’edcf2a54-c24c-11e8-938f-597ab96d6fc1′]

3. Nikon D5300

DSLR Cameras with Built In HDR

Check on Amazon

Labeled Advanced DSLR for beginners by Nikon, the D5300 is one of the prominent in the APS-C line up from the company. Compared to the other two options we have already discussed, this could be one of the devices without much to say regarding autofocus functionality.

It offers an improved video mode in comparison to the predecessor Nikon D5200; it provides a battery backup of up to 600 shots per charge. It can indeed be considered to be a fully loaded camera with its feature set but lacks a touchscreen.

A few features worthy of mentioning can be

  • Capture and share your memories instantly with the WiFi-enabled design
  • Best in class ergonomics for comfortable operation.
  • 180-degree swivel for the vari-angle display screen
  • A capable 39 point autofocus functionality.
  • Continuous shooting at 5 frames per second for capturing the right moment.

Price – [amazon_link asins=’B00I1CPA0O’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’fc56f3fd-c24c-11e8-971b-658b79ee96fe’]

Conclusion

Well, it was Nikon that brought in the trend for the cameras with no low pass filter options. Until the launch of Nikon D800E, the low pass filter on a DSLR was considered to be an essential element of design and something that would not be possible to get rid of. The increased sharpness levels and an enhanced functionality made it possible for the technology to prosper further.

Lack of low pass filter has now been considered to be a plus point for a camera compared to the earlier days where it was entirely necessary to have a low pass filter on your camera. We assume the list of Nikon cameras that offer no low pass filter as in this compilation, should meet almost all your needs. If you are using any of them, do share your thoughts with us.

Also check Sony’s innovation in this regard:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKoWrkEj1qo

Best Windows Hello Compatible Webcams for Windows 10 Within Budget

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
Best Windows Hello Compatible Webcams for Windows 10 Within Budget

If you are looking to use “Facial Recognition” to unlock your Windows 10 PC, you would need Windows Hello Compatible Webcams.

Windows 10 is a unique ecosystem in itself. It offers you a host of new features, and the regular updates have been adding in extra features over the years. From the security point of view, we would consider it one of the excellent operating systems – thanks to a host of security elements included in the package. One such classic security feature is Windows Hello. Which webcams should you opt for if you are looking to find the best for your facial recognition option?

Also Read: Windows 11 Windows Hello Webcams

Windows Hello Compatible Webcams – An Overview

Have you updated your device to Windows 10 recently have been on the latest version of the operating system? In that case, you should invariably be using Windows Hello as an added security. Setting it up may not be an issue as such, but you would need a compatible webcam for the feature to work.

Before we would consider webcams worth their salt, let us check out what exactly Windows Hello is.

What is Windows Hello?

How To Fix Windows Hello Isnt Available On This Device on Windows 10

Some PCs and laptops with fingerprint readers can work with Windows Hello. However, our post is specific to the Windows Hello Facial recognition feature, where some devices can recognize your face and fingerprint to log you in. Moreover, you can also sign in to your Windows PC using Windows Hello companion devices, such as the Microsoft Band and some Windows 10 smartphones.

Windows Hello provides you a password-free, cognitive facial recognition-based login functionality available on Windows 10. In effect, you would use it for logging into your Windows without having to type in the password.

Since Windows Hello lets you log in to Windows 10 through face unlocking methods, you need supported devices. A few options for biometric functionality include iris scanning, fingerprint scanning, and facial recognition. The feature will require you to have access to accessories like a fingerprint scanner or webcam.

Related: Microsoft Teams Certified Webcams

Apart from logging in to your Windows 10, Windows Hello would also help you sign in to a few Windows 10 apps. Dropbox and One Drive are a couple of examples in that regard. However, not all apps are supported, and that can be something disappointing for techies out there.

Having understood those basic concepts, here are a few compatible webcams you can give a try:

Best Windows Hello Compatible Webcams

Logitech Brio Webcam

Check on Amazon

 Microsoft Store

 

Amazon India
Creative Labs Senz3D Check on Amazon
Razer Stargazer Depth-Sensing HD Webcam Check on Amazon
Mouse Facial Recognition Web-Camera for Windows Hello Check on Amazon
LilBit Face Recognition USB IR Camera Check on Amazon
Mouse Facial Recognition Anti-Spoofing CM02-A Check on Amazon
Kaysuda Windows Hello IR Camera Check on Amazon
Moomax EC-X1 IR Camera Check on Amazon
CA20 by Kaysuda – USB IR Camera for Windows Hello  

Check on Amazon

MouseComputer – CM02A Facial Recognition

 Check on Amazon
Kiss Fish Webcam 1080p Web Camera Check on Amazon
Kaysuda RGB 720P Webcam Check on Amazon
ATOPNUC 1080p Check on Amazon
Dell Dell UltraSharp HDR 4K Webcam Check on Amazon

We also do have some webcams which we do not highly recommend. But they are out there and it is something you can buy. See below:

Microsoft Kinect V2

 Check on Amazon

Lenovo 500 Full HD USB Webcam

 Check on Amazon

Intel D435 RealSense Depth Camera

 Check on Amazon

Azure Kinect DK 

 Developer focussed and designed for custom AI Vision and Cognitive Services. Not for consumer use!

wo-we

 Check on Amazon

Yealink UVC30

 Check on Amazon

Dell UltraSharp HDR 4K Webcam

 Check on Amazon

 

The RealSense camera is more developer focussed and less of a Windows Hello fit. There is an open-source Realsense SDK works that work on both Windows and Linux. If you are a dev and plan to incorporate 3d point clouds or similar use cases, this camera is for you.

Now, let us go through the individual devices in more detail to know them better.

1. Logitech Brio Webcam

Check on Amazon Microsoft Store Amazon India

One of the most advanced webcams, the Logitech Brio Webcam, is quality personified regarding the image quality that it offers you. An astonishing 2160p resolution and HDR compatibility would make it an excellent choice in every right.

Some of the features we would focus on include.

  • A stunning 4K + HDR compatibility
  • The RightLight™ 3 light correction technology for quality video quality, streaming, and recording.
  • Assured true-to-life HD video with autofocus and premium glass lens.
  • Support for multiple connectivity options, including USB 2.0 Type-A and USB 3.0 Type A and C connections
  • Certified for Skype for Business and Cisco, it offers you excellent enterprise functionality.

Equipped with an easy-to-use stand, that is the best you can opt for. You have access to a 5X zoom compatibility. Here are some of the technical specifications of the device:

Specifications Logitech Brio 4K
4K Ultra HD video calling (up to 4096 x 2160 pixels @ 30 fps)
1080p Full HD video calling (up to 1920 x 1080 pixels @ 30 or 60 fps)
720p HD video calling (up to 1280 x 720 pixels @ 30, 60, or 90 fps)
Plug-and-play USB connectivity
Field of View:

  • Diagonal: 90°
  • Horizontal: 82.1°
  • Vertical: 52.2°

 
Zoom 5x digital zoom in Full HD

RightLight™3 with HDR
Autofocus Yes,
Lens Glass Optics
Microphone 2 Omni-directional mics
Compatibility Windows Hello

Plug and play USB connectivity
Certified for Skype for Business and ready for Teams
Weight 63 grams
Cable Length 2.2 meters
DIMENSIONS 27 mm x 102 mm x 27 mm

2. Creative Labs Senz3D

Check on Amazon

Creative is a manufacturer well known for audio accessories for your laptops and PCs. However, they also have a name carved for itself in the webcam segment as well. It comes with almost all features that you would look ahead to in a capable webcam.

Here are some of its high-level specifications:

RGB Video Resolution Full HD 1080p (1920 x 1080)
IR Depth Resolution VGA (640×480)
RGB Frame Rate:
  • 60 fps @ 720p,
  • 30 fps @ 1080p
IR Frame Rate 60 fps @ 640×480
FOV (Field-of-View) 77° (RGB), 85° (IR depth)
Range 0.2m ~ 1.5m
Microphones Dual Mic:

  • CrystalVoice Noise Reduction,
  • Beam Forming,
  • Echo Cancellation and
  • Voice Morph Omni-directional
Frequency Response 20Hz – 20kHz
Sensitivity (1kHz) 37�3 dB
Signal-to-noise Ratio (SNR) 65dB
Power USB 3.0 Interface
Projector Type Class 1 IR Laser Projector
Dimensions (H x W x D) 44 x 100 x 157mm
Weight 350g

A few features we loved with the webcam include.

  • Utterly futuristic in its appearance and functionality.
  • It incorporates high-end 3D scanning and facial recognition technology.
  • Best suited for both AR functionality and gaming.
  • It offers you practically unlimited possibilities.
  • Communicate in a crystal clear voice with Cortana and get things done.

It may be a little expensive, yet it can be the best you can go with if you look to the future.

3. Razer Stargazer Depth-Sensing HD Webcam

Check on Amazon

Have you ever given a thought to opting for the affordable version of the webcam? The Razer Stargazer Depth-Sensing HD Webcam should be one of the best options in that case. It offers you a high capture rate and provides you with lifelike video capability.

The webcam also comes with 3D scan compatibility for faces and objects. Get ready for advanced facial and gesture recognition for the best experience regarding camera performance.

A couple of features that we would consider a good option for your webcam requirements can be

  • The USB 3.0 compatible camera supports Windows Hello functionality and offers you a high-end 60 fps shooting capability.
  • The dynamic background removal feature lets you have the best gaming experience ever.
  • Enjoy lifelike streaming with the best quality camera functionality.
  • It lets you enjoy multiplayer games in a purely new way.
  • Unique depth-sensing capability.

Refer to the specs table below:

  • Ultra-high 60 frames per second capture optimized for streaming capped at 720p Max 1080p HD video capture
  • Automatic noise-canceling dual array mic
  • Dynamic Background Removal
  • 3D scanning
  • Facial & gesture recognition
  • Flexible clip for laptops and desktop monitors

4. Mouse Facial Recognition Web-Camera for Windows Hello (Cm01-A)

Check on Amazon

“Mouse” is a lesser-known brand when it comes to webcams, but the camera is designed specifically for the Windows 10 operating system. The device is compatible with any Windows 10 installation, including a small footprint PC, laptop, or desktop.

A few features that we loved the most include

  • Fully compatible with Windows 10
  • It can unlock your PC through facial recognition in just under 1 second.
  • It uses 3D identification, and thus masquerading through the use of photographs can easily be avoided.
  • If your PC is a multi-user device, you can easily add a family member for perfect usability.
  • Easy to set up and configure
  • You can use it for Skype and similar other web conferencing tools.

5. LilBit Face Recognition USB IR Camera

Check on Amazon

Another affordable option, the LilBit Face Recognition USB IR Camera, should be your best bet for Windows Hello compatibility. The multi-user functionality should allow you to configure it for your family members as well.

Some of the features you would include.

  • It comes with dual microphone support.
  • Works exceptionally well with USB 3.0
  • You have access to HD 720p resolution, which should be ideal enough for Skype.
  • Masquerade detection, along with depth-sensing functionality.
Features Specs
IR Camera resolution: 640×480 pixels
IR Camera Max Image Transfer Rate: Max Image Transfer Rate 100fps @ 640×480
RGB Camera resolution: 1280×720 1280×720 HD
RGB Camera Max Image Transfer Rate: Max Image Transfer Rate 30fps@1280×720
Camera resolution (max): 1280×720/30fps (around 920,000 pixels) 1280×720/30fps (around 920,000 pixels)
IR LED Emission Wavelength: Centroid wavelength 850nm
Digital microphone: Digital microphone*2
I/O Port: USB2.0 or USB 3.0(recommended)
Operating Temperature:  -30℃ to +70℃ (-22F to +158F)
Stable Image Temperature: 0℃ to +50℃ (32F to +122F)
Distance Range: 30cm-100cm
Product Dimension(LxWxH): 135mm*22mm*53mm (5.31×0.87×2.09 inch)
Net Weight: 115g (0.253 Ibs)
USB cable length: 4.92ft (1.5 m)

Mouse Facial Recognition Anti-Spoofing CM02-A

Check on Amazon

Specially designed for Windows Hello integration on Windows 10, the CM02-A is also adaptive for multiple users. It also supports masquerade detection utilizing an InfraRed camera. The high-speed recognition within one second makes it an exceptional choice by many standards.

A few features that should make it one of the excellent choices would include

  • A perfect hands-free solution for your needs.
  • It can capture 3D identification of all the facial features.
  • Easy to set up and use.
  • Works effectively with even the latest version of Windows 10 viz 1903
  • An excellent video quality.

You can check out the webcam at this link on Amazon.

Kaysuda Windows Hello IR Camera

Check on Amazon

It is one of the cheaper options in this list and is quite fast in IR facial detection, especially using Windows Hello. It comes with dual noise cancellation mics and a 720p RGB webcam for your usual video calls.

It also enables you to use it on a shared computer with the primary focus on facial detection. The IR camera comes with a resolution of 640×480, and the on-board RGB camera comes with a video resolution of 1280×720 and a max frame rate of 30fps (around 920,000 pixels).

It supports USB 2.0 or USB 3.0, with the higher version recommended if you have one available.

Moomax EC-X1 IR Camera

Check on Amazon

The EC-X1 is a Windows Hello, IR Camera. It comes with a 720p resolution webcam with Dual Mic for ultra-sharp streaming, webcasting, or recording video. The specs are in line with most of the other budget Windows Hello cameras on this list.

The IR Camera allows you to authenticate and login or unlock the windows10 system. The RGB part will enable you to operate it as a regular webcam.

The webcam also supports Windows 7, 32/64 bit OS, but only as a WebCam.

CA20 by Kaysuda – USB IR Camera for Windows Hello

Check on Amazon

Like its older sibling, who is also featured in this list, this webcam also supports Windows 10’s hello feature. However, the native resolution of the webcam gets bumped to Full HD (1920X1080). The IR camera module still supports 640 x360, which does the job just fine. Here are the specification highlights were given in the table below:

RGB Camera resolution
  • 1920X1080 (default)
  • 30fps@1920X1080 (Max Image Transfer Rate)
IR Camera resolution 640 x360
Video decoding format YUY2 / MJPG
Capture File Format Avi & Asf
I/O Port USB2.0 or USB 3.0(recommended)
Operating Distance Range 30cm-100cm (1ft-3.3ft)
USB cable length 4.92ft (1.5 m)
Field of view: Horizontal 72.4°, Vertical: 44.7°, Diagonal: 80.0°
Power Consumption 5V/500mA
Weight 140 grams
OS Requirements
  • Windows 10
  • Windows 8.1,32/64 bit OS, Windows 7, 32/64 bit OS only support WebCam.

MouseComputer – CM02A Facial Recognition

Check on Amazon

The MouseComputer CM02A is marketed as a work from home ready, windows hello compatible webcam designed for home office use. Most of the features are identical to their predecessor, with minor tweaks here and there.

Overall, it does the job as advertised at an affordable price point. It offers good competition to the Kaysuda facial recognition camera, which is also a top seller in this category.

Specifications:

  • Supported OS: Windows 10
  • Camera: IR Camera Resolution 640 × 480
  • Web Camera Resolution (max) 1280 × 720 30fps (around 920,000pixels)
  • Focus Distance Range: 30cm – 100cm
  • Mic: Dual Array Microphones
  • Power Source: Standard USB Bus Power
  • I/O Interface: USB2.0
  • USB Cable Length: 1.5m / 4.92ft

Kiss Fish – Windows Hello Webcam

Check on Amazon

Unlike most of the webcams that we have on the list, this one comes with a 1080p native resolution. It meets the IR security requirements to be ‘Windows Hello’ capable and offers the same cost-effectively. The only downside is the cable length. If you do not have a desktop that sits on the table, this webcam is not recommended. For Laptops, the cable length works out to be just fine.

Also, USB Hubs are not supported if you are planning to extend the cable length. Here are the specs sheet below:

Webcam Resolution 1080p
Windows Hello Yes, Facial Recognition IR camera
Viewing Angle: 88.6° ±3°
Pixel: 2 million
USB Cable Length: 1m / 39.37”
Dimensions  76 x 15 x 8mm / 2.99” x 0.59” x 0.31”
Weight 0.02 KG

Dell UltraSharp HDR 4K Webcam

Check on Amazon

The webcam comes with 4K native resolution with AI auto framing 3D/2D video noise reduction to avoid motion blurring. More importantly, it comes with Dell ExpressSign-in that detects your presence and authenticates using Windows Hello to automatically log you in. When you walk away, it locks your system for increased security.

One important thing to note here is that it works seamlessly with macOS. However, the Dell Peripheral Manager Software is supported only on Windows 10 64 Bit OS. The software helps you manage the webcam settings and elements like HDR, AI Auto Framing and Changing Field of View among others.

The Parting Thoughts

Well, those are a few best options for webcams compatible with Windows Hello functionality. If your built-in camera does not support Windows Hello, opt for the featured webcams’ best features. Relieve yourself from the shackles of having to enter a password every time, and as Dell aptly puts it, become “YOU ARE THE PASSWORD”!

Also Read:

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Mirrorless Camera Specs Comparison

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Mirrorless Camera Specs Comparison

Fujifilm has been one of the prominent players in the realm of offering the best cameras for the photography buffs. With the launch of the capable Fujifilm XH-1, the company has entered the much-needed area of 5 Axis in body stabilization options. We will compare the two strong contenders from Fujifilm (Fujifilm X-H1 vs Fujifilm X-T3) and see how they are positioned against one another.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Fujifilm X-T3 – How Do They Compare?

The X–T3 is possibly the best and the most advanced camera from Fujifilm in recent times. However, the launch of Fujifilm X-H1 can be seen a step ahead of the functionality whether you consider it from its X series or the mirrorless cameras as a whole.

If you are looking to know more about the differentiation that these two cameras come with, here are our detailed comparison report based on a few key parameters.

Sensor Stabilisation

Like we mentioned already, the Fujifilm X-H1 is the first option in the X series to offer the in-body sensor stabilization. It provides you a 5 axis in body stabilization. You should be able to work with it either using the non-stabilized lenses or with stabilized ones in conjunction.

Though the X-T3 was launched much after the X-H1, it does not offer you in body sensor stabilization. The technology seems to limited and exclusive to the Fujifilm X-H1 as of now among all the Fujifilm cameras currently available. If you are looking for the stabilization options on your Fujifilm X-T3, you will need to depend upon the stabilized lenses for the purpose.

Autofocus

This is possibly the area where the XH 1 falls short of the X-T3. The latter comes with the hybrid autofocus system developed by Fujifilm.

The X-T3 offers you 117 phase detection points. That’s what you would get if you are opting for the 13 x 9 grid. If you are opting for a 17 x 25 grid, you can get 425 autofocus points. The numbers would be 91 for a 13 x 7 grid and 325 points on a 13 x 25 grid. The X-T3 offers 4x number of phase detection pixels in comparison to the X-H1.

Moreover, the X-T3 provides you full coverage of the sensor for the autofocus covering 99 percent of the width and height. The X-H1 comes with coverage for only the central part of the sensor. The low light autofocus functionality is again better placed on the X-T3 than the X-H1. The numbers are -3V opposed to the -1V. You would also be blessed with a better face and eye detection performance on the newer X-T3 than that on the X-H1.

The Physical Properties

The flagship model Fujifilm X-H1 offers a better-enlarged grip option. This can be helpful in handling the larger telephoto lenses.

The physical dimensions of the Fujifilm X- T3 read 132.5 x 92.8 x 58.8mm, and that of X-H1 are 139.8 x 97.3 x 85.5mm. The weight of the two competing siblings is 539 grams and 673 grams. The body on the X-H1 is more robust and offers durability. You also have access to the scratch resistant surface.

Video Shooting Capabilities

In spite of being the flagship model, the X-H1 once again falls short of expectations in comparison to the X- T3. The latter offers a higher frame rate for 4K video shooting. It also comes with faster bitrate as well. The customization options available on the X- T3 are indeed far better than those on the X-H1. The camera is indeed the first when you are looking for 4K recording at 60p at 10 bit.

The cropping in 4K recording on the Fujifilm HX 1 is 1.17X while the same on the X-T3 is slightly better at 1.18X. That would put both of them on the same level. For the 1080p recording, either of them can record at 60 fps or 120 fps. However, you would find a higher bit rate at 200 Mbps on the X-T3 compared to the 100 Mbps on the X-H1.

The specifications for video recording are as follows:

Fujifilm XH 1

Fujifilm X- T3
4K up to 30 fps 4K up to 60 fps
4K at 200 Mbps 4K at 400 Mbps
External recording in 4:2:2 8-bit External recording in 4:2:2 10-bit
Internal recording in 4:2:0 8-bit Internal recording in 4:2:0 10-bit
H.264 codec H.264 and H.265 codecs

Battery Performance

Both of them use the same battery pack – the NP-126S. However, the battery backup on both of them differs considerably. The Fujifilm X-T3 provides you with up to 390 shots per single charge. The X-H1 falls considerably lower end with 310 shots on a single charge.

If you are shooting in 4K, you will get around 35 minutes on the X-H1, while the X-T3 can squeeze in up to 40 minutes. Attaching a vertical battery grip can improve the performance though. Please note that the ratings available are the only representative and may not be the actual results. You would be able to get a better option than those specified.

What are The Benefits of Fujifilm XH-1 over Fujifilm X- T3?

Well, we would prefer the following features on the X-H1 in comparison to the X–T3 –

  • You can check the shooting parameters with the control panel.
  • The LCD offers a fully flexible design for those shoots where you need to place the camera at odd angles.
  • You have access to better burst performance.
  • The stabilization technology will ensure sharper images.
  • Better grip will make it best suited for larger telephoto lenses

What Advantages Does The X-T3 offer over XH 1?

Well, in contrast, the X-T3 comes with the following advantages –

  • Better video shooting capabilities.
  • Better battery backup
  • The screen is more significantly larger at 3.2 inches compared to 3 inches of the XH 1
  • It is of more recent origin.
  • Affordable pricing.

The Concluding Thoughts

Well, one thing is sure. The Fujifilm has presented the X-H1 as the flagship model, but all the accolades go with the newly launched Fujifilm X-T3. It introduces a host of new concepts and features including  4K recording at 60 fps, enhanced autofocus and burst shooting capabilities and new sensor technology. We would consider the X- T3 to be one of the best options for your video shooting and other photography requirements.

It indeed beats the flagship model in almost every respect. Check it out once, and you will find out the truth.

Canon EOS R vs Sony A7R Series Full Frame Mirrorless Cameras Specs

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
Canon EOS R vs Sony A7R Series Full Frame Mirrorless Cameras Specs

Sony, Canon, and Nikon are the three fierce competitors to one another concerning the cameras. If you are one of them looking ahead to the best experience regarding quality camera beasts, the Canon EOS R vs Sony A7R is the two capable options you can check out. How do these two cameras compare with one another? We will check out the differences between the two high-end performers.

Canon EOS R vs Sony A7R – How do They Compare with One Another?

Well, both of them are the best full-frame mirrorless cameras, and Sony brought out the excellent performers among the ILCs or Interchangeable Lens Cameras, and the Sony A7R is one of the beasts in the line-up.

We will compare them based on the few key parameters. That would offer you a proper input into how do they compare with one another.

The Resolution

The Sony A7R comes with a back-illuminated sensor at 42.2 MP resolution. It does not offer you a low pass filter as such and will not provide any option of maximizing the sharpness. You also have an LSI chip that improves the processing speed.

The Canon EOS R has a 30.3 MP resolution. It comes with an updated version of the chip and also offers you a microlens option for the short-range mount. You have access to a low pass filter on your camera.

Features / Particulars Sony A7R III

 Canon EOS R
Sensor Type BSI CMOS CMOS
Size Full frame – E-MOUNT Full frame – RF Mount
Sensor Format 35 mm (Exmor R) 35 mm
Sensor dimensions 35.6mm x 23.8mm 36mm x 24.0mm
Resolution 42.4 MP 30.3 MP

 

Canon EOS R does not offer you a sensor stabilization. The Sensor stabilization has been one of the most sought-after options in mirrorless cameras, and the omission may not be taken well by the fans of mirrorless cameras. You may need to go with the lenses with the image stabilization capabilities.

Sony A7R, on the other hand, offers you a 5 axis stabilization option. Sony claims that it is the best you would find on a Sony camera. That would make it an exceptional choice for use on any lens whether it has any kind of focussing option or not.

The ISO Range

As long as ISO range is concerned, Canon EOS R offers you a range between 100 to 40000. You have the option of pushing it between 50 and 102400 through extension. For the Sony, the ISO range available is up to 32000. You would be able to extend it between 50 and 102400.

Both the cameras would disappoint to some extent with the lower value of ISO. Both the competitors offer you a 50 ISO option. We would have loved the option for around 32 ISO.

Autofocus

Both of them come with on-sensor phase detection autofocus option. The points make use of smaller sensors to find the phase difference and suitably apply the difference to lock into the right focus.

Canon opts for the Dual Pixel CMOS Autofocus. Here, each pixel is made of two photodiodes instead of one. Sony comes with one pair of pixels that are masked partially. One of the pixels receives the light on the right while the other receive them on the left.

Canon beats Sony regarding focus points quite massively. It has 5655 points! That is indeed the highest number for any camera we have ever found. Sony offers you 399 phase detection points. There are 425 contrast detection points as well. The focus would cover 88 percent of width and 100 percent of height on Canon EOS R, while Sony has 68 percent of the sensor covered.

Canon claims the fastest autofocus is locking at 0.05 sec. Sony has not released any official figure for the metric. The minimum sensitivity on Sony A7R is -3V with an f/2 lens. Canon would offer you a better option at -4.5V at the same rating.

The Size and Weight

In that genre, you would find both the cameras in the same league. The Sony A7R has a 657 grams weight, and the weight of EOS R stands at 660 grams.

Regarding the size or physical dimensions, Sony is smaller than the Canon EOS R. The physical dimensions of the camera read 126.9 x 73.7 x 95.6mm. The Canon EOS R has the physical aspects of 135.8 x 98.3 x 84.4 mm.

A comfortable gripping is one of the features we liked the most about Canon EOS R. Sony may feel awkward to handle if you are using larger sensors.

Video Shooting Compatibility

Well, both the cameras offer you the 4K shooting compatibility. Almost all the features are practically equivalent to one another on either of the cameras.

Sony offers you multiple options to work with while recording in 4K. You can go with the full frame mode for a functional service. If you are shooting in full HD, Canon EOS R offers you 60 fps and 180 Mbps. Sony, on the other hand, can go up to 120 fps and 100Mbps. The same kind of frame rate would only be possible with Canon if you choose 720p.

The ISO range offered on EOS R can reach up to 12800 while shooting in 4K and 25600 for the 1080p videos. The Sony A7R can go as far as 32000. However, you would not be able to push the extended values. As for the profiles, EOS R offers you Canon Log profile for use in internal and external recordings. The Sony A7R comes with a host of customization options regarding picture profiles.

The Storage

Regarding storage options, Sony uses dual SD cards for its A7R lineup. Canon, on the other hand, would offer you SD card alone. That would indicate the service is moving towards a professional consumer level performance on its cameras.

Battery Performance

The Sony A7R offers you an estimated 530 exposures for a single battery charge. The Canon EOS R is slightly lower in performance regarding battery backup and should provide you with 430 shots per charge. We would expect that Canon would come with additional battery packs.

Do note that these ratings are entirely theoretical. In the real world scenarios, you would find better results. Both the cameras offer USB charging.

The Lens System

When it comes to the availability of lenses, Sony excels with its full line up of options. You can make use of E-Mount lenses on Sony for both full frame and APS-C camera options. The cross-compatibility of Sony cameras is best placed in comparison to the Canon systems you find.

Burst Rate

We were expecting a better burst shooting option on Canon EOS R given its smaller megapixel count. It offers you a continuous burst shooting options of just 8 fps. However, the continuous shooting with autofocus would be still slower than that at 5.5 fps. The speed can go even shorter at 3 fps if you are opting for C-AF and Focus priority. Sony offers you a better functionality at 10 fps no matter what settings you are opting for.

The Sony A7R can take 76 RAW or JPG files. On the other hand, Canon EOS R can handle 47 RAW files, 78 Compressed files, and 100 JPG files and thus can be a better option. However, the faster burst speed combined with, the better resolution should make it one of the excellent choices. It indeed offers you a consistent performance than the Canon offering.

The Concluding Thoughts

Canon is trying to capture the mirrorless camera market, and the EOS R is indeed the first attempt in that direction. Of course, if you are a canon fan and want to try out their first encounter in the realm, this should be one of the good options you can go with. Of course, we would expect Canon to come with new offerings quite soon.

The Sony A7R has been one of the great options you can give a try too. The image quality should be one of the best given the 42.4 MP functionality that it offers. Even regarding video shooting options, we find Sony A7R providing you with a higher degree of flexibility. EOS R applies a 1.7x crop while you record in 4K.

In any case, we would look ahead for and foresee a good deal of competition in the realm, and that would indeed be a lot of advanced options for the consumer at large.

Best Canon RF Lenses RF Mount for EOS R Full Frame Mirrorless Camera

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
Best Canon RF Lenses RF Mount for EOS R Full Frame Mirrorless Camera

The full-frame mirrorless cameras have been the new trend. Canon, which has been at the forefront of the development of the new cameras, has recently launched its EOS R to take care of the segment. In an attempt to show off the capabilities of the brand new RF mount, Canon has recently launched four new RF lenses. We will check out the newly launched RF lenses and the options that they come with finer details.

Best Canon RF Lenses – An Overview

Canon has recently launched its new full-frame mirrorless camera – the EOS R. Positioned as the flagship model in the realm of mirrorless cameras, it boasts of the original RF mount. Before we move on to understand the concept of RF lenses and their compatibility – we will check out what precisely an RF mount is.

RF Mount – What It is?

Well, as you might have already understood, the new RF mount is a new concept launched with the EOS R full frame mirrorless camera. Announced in September 2018, the camera features a full-frame mirrorless interchangeable lenses camera.

Do note that the RF mount would not be compatible with the Canon EF and EF-S mount lenses. However, you can opt for the three Canon adapters specifically designed for use with the RF mount. The RF mount makes it possible to use the new RF lenses.

What features do RF Lenses Come With?

Image Source: Canon

Well, RF lenses are a part of the new era of lenses. They have been designed for a high-quality performance along with an emphasis on speed. The lenses are specifically designed for the new EOS R camera. They offer you more advanced levels of intuitive controls.

You have access to the customizable Control Ring. The Control Ring offers you the options for using the aperture compensation, shutter speed, ISO and compensation for exposure. You can make adjustments without the need for looking away from the subject. They offer you the best options for a natural shooting performance.

The Best Canon RF Lenses – The new Launches

Canon has recently launched four new lenses in the RF genre along with the new Canon EOS R camera. While two of them are suited for the newly launched EOS R, the other two are with the widest aperture. Possibly, canon wants to show off the capabilities that the RF mount comes with. Like we said before, all the four lenses come with their control rings.

1. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L

Check on Amazon

The new Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is designed to fit in the shoes of the most popular Canon lenses – the Canon 24-105mm f/4L. While the older generation lens is for the full frame cameras, the new RF lens is designed for the mirrorless option.

The key features Offred by the lens include

  • Utterly versatile design for use in practical and professional zoom functionality.
  • You have access to 5 stop image stabilization for enhanced quality.
  • The lens ensures better sharpness even in low light scenarios.
  • Best suited for steadier handheld performance.
  • The Nano USM autofocus offers smoother and faster autofocus.

The lens should be best suited for portrait photography, creative ideas, and travel photography. The lens comes with Aspherical lens elements compensating for distortion and spherical aberration.

The Spec Sheet

Zoom Range 24 to 105 mm
Minimum Focus 0.45 mm
Lens Control Option Control Ring
Aperture 9 Blade
Motor Nano USM
Lens Construction 18 elements in 14 Groups
Maximum Aperture f/4
Minimum Aperture 22

2. RF 35mm f/1.8 IS Macro STM

Check on Amazon

If you are looking for a lens with the macro capabilities and a faster aperture, the RF 35mm f/1.8 IS Macro STM should fit your bill exactly the way you would want it to.

A few salient features of the lens include

  • High-end image quality coupled with a wide angle lens.
  • Best in class low light performance. You should be able to capture the right kind of ambiance even in dark environment.
  • 5 stop stabilization for the sharpest images ever in low light.
  • Excellent quality micro shots.
  • The best option for portability with its compact size.

The lens would suit you best if you are into travel photography, close up shots and landscape photography needs.

The Spec Sheet

Zoom Range 24 to 105 mm
Minimum Focus 0.17 mm
Lens Control Option Control Ring
Aperture 9 Blade
Motor Quiet STM
Lens Construction 11 elements in 9 Groups
Maximum Aperture f/1.8
Minimum Aperture 22

3. RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Check on Amazon

Are you a professional photographer and are looking for the best experience regarding immensely superior sharpness, creative control and low light performance – you would indeed be more than happy with the new RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens from Canon.

The ultimate 50 mm lens from Canon boasts of the following features –

  • A super bright design with the highest image quality.
  • Faster optical performance
  • The best in class L series photography
  • Best suited for professional photography requirements.

The best application areas that the lens would suit include portrait photography, street photography and excellent art shots.

The Spec Sheet

Zoom Range 24 to 105 mm
Minimum Focus 0.4 mm
Lens Control Option Control Ring
Aperture 10 Blade
Motor USM
Lens Construction 15 elements in 9 Groups
Maximum Aperture f/1.2
Minimum Aperture 16

4. RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Check on Amazon

Advanced zoom capabilities would make it one of the best options regarding the RF cameras for your need. Canon claims that the lens redefines the zoom performance.

A few features worthy of mentioning include

  • It is considered to be the best first large aperture zoom lens compatible with full frame devices
  • A consistent f/2.0 brightness throughout the zoom range
  • The perfect silent zoom with Canon’s USM technology.
  • Smarter controls for an efficient and natural shooting.

The application areas that the lens would be most suitable include travel photography, wedding photography, and photojournalism.

The Spec Sheet

Zoom Range 24 to 105 mm
Minimum Focus 0.39 mm
Lens Control Option Control Ring
Aperture 9 Blade
Motor USM
Lens Construction 19 elements in 13 Groups
Maximum Aperture f/2
Minimum Aperture 22

The Parting Thoughts

Well, these are the currently available RF lenses from Canon as things stand as of now. There have been rumors about the new launches. However, we would not like to comment on them until canon officially announces the new lenses.

Before we conclude, we would like to make it clear that if you do not have a camera with RF mount, you would not be able to make use of any of these lenses. They are NOT backward compatible and would not fit on the older EF or EF-S mounts. However, if you have the older lenses, they can be used with the cameras with RF mount easily by opting for the appropriate adapters from Canon.

Nikon D3500 vs D3400 DSLR Specifications Comparison & Differences

GigaPixel Staff
-
0
Nikon D3500 vs D3400 DSLR Specifications Comparison & Differences

Nikon, as we are all aware of, is one of the prominent players in the realm of DSLR cameras. The company recently launched its new entry-level DSLR without much hoopla. How does D3500 compare with the predecessor the D3400? Let us compare the two devices (Nikon D3500 vs D3400) and understand what improvements does the D3500 pack in on the new offering.

Nikon D3500 vs D3400 – A Close Comparison

Well, both Nikon D3500 and D3400 are entry-level DSLR cameras and have many things in common. However, the D3500 being the upgrade and a newly launched device has a few features different from the predecessor. We will compare the two cameras based on a few key parameters.

The Sensor

In terms of the sensor compatibility, the D3500 comes with the same 24 MP pixel count as on the D3400. Both of them offer the same APS-C sensor and do not provide the optical low pass filter.

On the specification sheet, we observe the D3500 having a 24.78 MP resolution as compared to the 24.72 MP on the D3400. Though technically slightly different, this should not have any major effect from the practical perspective.

However, the D3500 may be a good option given it is new and comes with better sensor configuration.

Features / Particulars Nikon D3500

[amazon_link asins=’B07GW23M7T’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’eaa26332-b528-11e8-90c5-ddb1b079ea08′]

 Nikon D3400

[amazon_link asins=’B01KITZKDE’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’f4f13d92-b528-11e8-bd54-510335ea1f4d’]
Sensor size 24.78 MP 24.72 MP
Format DX DX
Sensor Size 23.5 mm x 15.6 mm 23.5 mm x 15.6 mm
Resolution 6000 x 4000 pixels 6000 x 4000 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS

The Physical Properties

Features / Particulars Nikon D3500

[amazon_link asins=’B07GW23M7T’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’eaa26332-b528-11e8-90c5-ddb1b079ea08′]

Nikon D3400

[amazon_link asins=’B01KITZKDE’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’f4f13d92-b528-11e8-bd54-510335ea1f4d’]
Physical Dimensions 125 x 98 x76 mm 124 x 98x 69.5 mm
Weight 365 grams 395 grams
Weather sealing No No

 

As can be seen from the above table, both D3500 and D3400 have the same physical dimensions. However, the weight of the D3400 is a little more. It could be a key consideration when you consider portability.

The Design

From the design point of view, you are bound to find a few differences between the D3500 and D3400. The grip on the D3500 is a little better than that on the D3400. This should be quite helpful when you use the camera. Moreover, a better grip can also translate into better handling when you are using long or front heavy lenses with your camera.

There have been a few other changes as well concerning the design. The buttons you found on the left-hand side of the LCD screen on the D3400 have been shifted to the top and right-hand side. This aids in a better ergonomics. The flash button that resided on the front on D3400 has now stands moved to the rear.

The Complete Specification Sheet

Features / Particulars

Nikon D3500

[amazon_link asins=’B07GW23M7T’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’eaa26332-b528-11e8-90c5-ddb1b079ea08′]

Nikon D3400

[amazon_link asins=’B01KITZKDE’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’f4f13d92-b528-11e8-bd54-510335ea1f4d’]
Shutter Speed 1/4000 sec 1/4000 sec
Continuous Shooting 5 fps 5 fps
ISO sensitivity 100 to 25600 100 to 25600
Number of Auto Focus points 11 11
LCD Screen size 3.0 inch digital 3.0 inch digital
Screen resolution 921000 dots 921000 dots
Battery EN-EL14a Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL14a Rechargeable Li-ion Battery
Battery Backup 1550 shots per charge 1200 shots per charge
Video resolution 1920×1080 FullHD

1280×720 HD 720p

640×480 VGA

 1920×1080 FullHD

1280×720 HD 720p

640×480 VGA
Video recording frame rate 60p,50p,30p,25p,24p, 720p 60/50fps 60p,50p,30p,25p,24p, 720p 60/50fps
Stereo audio recording No No
Optical Zoom for Video Yes Yes
Effective magnification 1.5 x 1.5 x
Focus Modes Automatic, Phase Detection and manual Automatic, Phase Detection and manual
Longest shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec
White balance modes Auto

Manual

Incandescent

Fluorescent

 Auto

Manual

Incandescent

Fluorescent
Exposure Compensation +/-5 +/-5
Optical Image Stabilisation No No
Connectivity Bluetooth Bluetooth
Connection ports HDMI and USB 2.0 HDMI and USB 2.0
Media Storage supported SD

SDHC

SDXC

 SD

SDHC

SDXC

Which One Should You Go For?

Well, both the Nikon D3500 and D3400 come with almost similar features and functionalities. You can opt for any of them and expect the same features across them.

A few slight differences you may observe on the new Nikon D3500 include

  • Better Battery Capability – The battery backup per charge is quite good compared to the Nikon D3400. You get 1550 shots per charge as compared to the 1200 shots per charge on the Nikon D3400.
  • An Enhanced Grip – As we already explained, the grip has been improved, and it can be a better option towards handling. It can also be helpful if you are using heavier lenses.
  • New Button layout – The button layout on the camera has been changed and now placed quite ergonomically. You can now concentrate on the subject before you rather than fiddling with the buttons.
  • Guide Mode for new Users – This will help the new users to get used to the functionality of the camera. It will help you learn the functioning easily.
  • SnapBridge Function – The Bluetooth based file transfer mode helps to transfer your images and videos straightaway without any need to connect to your computer. It can also be used for remote trigger functionality as well.

The Concluding Thoughts

Well, that was the complete comparison between the two capable DSLR cameras from Nikon. We will recommend you opt for the new variant given the additional features that it comes with. But, in case you are considering upgrading your current Nikon D3400 for a new Nikon D3500, we would not find a good option as such.

As you can observe from the above comparison chart and another discussion we carried out, the new D3500 is almost equivalent in every aspect (that should matter the most) to the three-year-old Nikon D3400. From that perspective – upgrading from a D3400 to a D3500 may not be a great idea. You may either wait for an upgrade from Nikon or go with any other option.

Have you used either the Nikon D3500 or D3400? If you have, you can share your thoughts and experiences with us. This will help our readers and us in understanding the differences and practical usability of a few best Nikon masterpieces.

1...202122...27Page 21 of 27