In this post, we find out and compare the IMX882 vs LYT600 vs IMX890 which are modern smartphone sensors build by Sony.
Affiliate Disclosure: Lensxp.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Ever wondered why some phone cameras outperform others, even with similar megapixel counts? The answer lies in the heart of the camera – the image sensor. Recently, the OnePlus community has been buzzing about the differences between the IMX 882, LYT 600, and IMX 890 sensors. Let’s break it down in simple terms:
IMX890 vs. IMX882 vs. LYT600: A Deep Dive into the 50MP Sensors Powering Your Phone's Camera.
By Alex Doe | Updated August 25, 2025
The Strategic Shift: From IMX to LYTIA
In the world of smartphone photography, Sony is the undisputed king of camera sensors. Their "IMX" and newer "LYTIA" series are found in everything from budget phones to ultra-premium flagships. Today, we're dissecting three of the most talked-about 50-megapixel sensors: the high-end IMX890 and the mainstream duo, the IMX882 and its rebranded twin, the LYT600.
The move from IMX to LYTIA isn't just a name change; it's a strategic rebranding to simplify Sony's product line and signal a new era focused on "creative imaging experiences." This means the LYT600 is functionally identical to the IMX882, but marketed as the newer option for mid-range phones. While they all share the same resolution, their performance is not the same. The differences come down to fundamental physics—sensor size, pixel size, and the technology packed around them.
Key Takeaways
IMX890 is Physically Superior: Its larger sensor and bigger pixels give it a significant advantage in light gathering and overall image quality potential.
IMX882 and LYT600 are Identical Twins: The LYT600 is a rebrand of the IMX882. They share the same hardware and performance.
The System Matters Most: A sensor only defines potential. The final image quality depends on the phone's lens and image processing software (ISP).
Specifications at a Glance
Specification
IMX882 / LYT600
IMX890 (Superior)
Optical Format (Size)
1/1.95"
1/1.56"
Native Pixel Size
0.8 µm
1.0 µm
Binned Pixel Size (4-in-1)
1.6 µm
2.0 µm
Resolution
50 MP
50.3 MP
Sensor Architecture
Stacked, Back-illuminated CMOS
Autofocus System
All-pixel AF
PDAF with 2x2 OCL
HDR Technology
LBMF HDR
DOL-HDR
Video Capabilities
4K @ 30fps
4K @ 60fps, 1080p @ 240fps
Target Market
Mid-Range
Upper Mid-Range / Flagship
The Tech Inside: Stacked, Back-Illuminated CMOS
All three sensors are built on Sony's modern architecture, which combines two key innovations for superior performance. Understanding this technology is key to appreciating why modern phone cameras are so capable.
1. Back-Illuminated Structure (BSI)
In older sensors, the metal wiring blocked some of the light. BSI flips the design, placing the wiring behind the light-sensitive photodiodes. This creates an unobstructed path for light, dramatically increasing light-capturing efficiency and sensitivity.
2. Stacked Design
This design separates the pixel layer from the signal processing circuit layer onto different silicon wafers. This allows both layers to be optimized independently, leading to faster readout speeds, more complex on-chip processing, and better overall performance.
A simplified diagram illustrating how a stacked, back-illuminated design allows more light to reach the photodiodes compared to older technologies.
Decoding the Features
Autofocus Battle
All-pixel AF (LYT600): Uses every pixel for phase detection, promising fast and accurate focus across the entire frame, even on moving subjects.
2x2 OCL (IMX890): Groups pixels under a single lens to detect focus in both horizontal and vertical directions, providing robust and reliable performance.
HDR Technology Explained
LBMF HDR (LYT600): A modern technique that combines multiple exposures to create a single image with a wider dynamic range.
DOL-HDR (IMX890): A more advanced method that reads out multiple exposures almost simultaneously, minimizing motion blur and ghosting in HDR photos of moving subjects.
Real-World Case Studies
The Mid-Range Champion
Sensor: IMX882 / LYT600
Phones like the Realme 12+ and Poco F6 use this sensor to deliver impressive daylight photos for their price. While low-light performance can be a limitation, excellent software tuning can produce vibrant, social-media-ready images.
The Flagship Contender
Sensor: IMX890
Devices like the OnePlus 11 and Realme 12 Pro+ leverage the IMX890's superior hardware. Paired with powerful processors and refined software (like Hasselblad tuning), they deliver excellent color accuracy, superb detail, and strong low-light results.
The Future Outlook: Beyond 2025
The mobile imaging landscape is evolving at a breakneck pace. While the sensors discussed here are current, the next generation will push boundaries even further. Key trends to watch include:
The Push for 1-Inch Sensors: Flagship devices are increasingly adopting massive 1-inch type sensors (like Sony's IMX989 and LYT-900), which offer near-DSLR levels of quality.
Variable Aperture: Technology that allows the lens to physically change its aperture size is making a comeback, offering more creative control over depth of field and better low-light performance.
AI-Powered ISPs: The role of the Image Signal Processor is becoming more critical than ever. Future SoCs will feature even more powerful AI and machine learning cores dedicated to real-time image analysis, semantic segmentation, and advanced computational photography tricks that can further enhance the output of any given sensor.
Performance Metrics Visualized
Light Gathering Potential (Pixel Area)
Overall Sensor Size (Diagonal)
The Trinity of Imaging: A System Approach
Remember that a sensor is only one part of the equation. The final photo you see is a result of the entire imaging system, a concept we call the "Trinity of Imaging":
1. The Sensor
Sets the ceiling for image quality potential by capturing raw light data.
2. The Lens (Optics)
Poor optics can ruin the potential of a great sensor by delivering a soft or distorted image.
3. The ISP (Processor)
The "brain" that processes raw data, handling color, noise reduction, and computational tricks.
The Final Verdict: A Clear Hierarchy
The comparative analysis reveals a clear hierarchy defined by physics and market strategy. The Sony IMX890 is unequivocally the superior sensor. Its larger physical size provides an insurmountable advantage in light-gathering, which is the most fundamental determinant of image quality. This is why it's reserved for higher-tier devices where camera performance is a primary selling point.
The IMX882 and LYT600 are highly competent solutions for the mid-range market. They provide a solid foundation for great daylight photography, making high-quality imaging accessible to more people. The rebranding to LYT600 is a strategic move by Sony to align this popular sensor with its forward-looking brand identity.
Final Guidance for Buyers
When looking at a phone's spec sheet, use the sensor model as an indicator of the manufacturer's ambition:
IMX890 (or LYT700 series): Signals a strong commitment to camera quality. Expect a high potential for excellent photos, but verify with device-specific reviews.
IMX882 / LYT600: Indicates a capable and modern main camera for a mid-range device. Expect a solid all-around imaging experience, especially in good lighting.
Ultimately, the sensor model is the starting point. The final verdict on any phone's camera must come from comprehensive reviews that assess how well the manufacturer has realized the sensor's potential through its optics and software.
Sensor Showdown: Size Matters (Mostly)
The discussions reveal that the IMX 882 and LYT 600 seem like twins on paper, boasting 50 megapixels on a similar sized (1/1.95″) plate with equally tiny pixels (0.8 microns). This suggests they capture a similar amount of detail.
The bigger brother, the IMX 890, steps in with a larger sensor (1/1.56″). Imagine a bigger light bucket – it can collect more light, especially in low-light situations, potentially leading to sharper, clearer photos. This is why some users are concerned about a downgrade from the IMX 890 to the LYT 600 in newer OnePlus models.
Hold on, There’s More to the Story
Unfortunately, we still do not have the nitty-gritty details to definitively compare these sensors. To truly understand the differences, we’d need technical specifications (think sensor datasheets) or controlled tests that compare low-light performance, noise levels, and other crucial factors.
Democratization of Photography: High-Quality on a Budget
The good news? high-quality sensors like the IMX 890 are finding their way into more affordable phones, like the Realme Narzo 70 Pro. This means great pictures without breaking the bank!
The Neverending Quest for the Best
The discussion doesn’t end there. One user even asks about the IMX 682 sensor, showcasing the ongoing quest within the community to understand and compare camera sensor performance across different devices.
The Takeaway: Beyond Megapixels
While megapixels play a role, the OnePlus community discussion sheds light on what smartphone users truly care about: real-world camera performance. Sensor size, software processing, and access to high-quality sensors in budget phones are all important factors to consider when choosing your next smartphone for capturing those special moments.
For the Tech-Savvy:
If you crave deeper dives, look for manufacturer datasheets or reviews from trusted tech sites that perform controlled sensor comparisons. These resources will provide the technical details you need to make an informed decision.
Quad Bayer Coding, PDAF, high SNR, OIS, multiple frame rates
Additional Features
Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), 4K video, and more
Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), 4K video, and more
Superior in lower light conditions
Lens Shading Correction, Dynamic Defect Pixel Correction, built-in temperature sensor
Conclusion
The discussion around smartphone camera sensors goes beyond just megapixels. While the OnePlus community debate highlights the similarities between the IMX 882 and LYT 600 sensors, the larger sensor size of the IMX 890 suggests it might perform better in low-light conditions. Software processing also plays a significant role, with GCam mentioned as a potential way to improve image quality.
For a clearer picture (pun intended!), users need to look for technical specifications or controlled tests that compare these sensors in detail. The good news is that high-quality sensors are becoming more affordable, allowing for great smartphone photography on a budget.
Ultimately, the choice depends on what matters most to you: megapixels might be a headline grabber, but sensor size, software capabilities, and overall camera performance are all key factors to consider when capturing those special moments.
We are a team of Photography enthusiasts with a passion for Digital technology. Our team is from diverse backgrounds, and together we contribute to what we love to do, write about Photography.