Site icon LensXP

Sigma 105mm F1.4 Art vs Nikon 105mm F1.4 Specifications Comparison

Sigma 105mm F1.4 Art vs Nikon 105mm F1.4

Looking for a comparison between the Sigma 105mm F1.4 Art vs Nikon 105mm F1.4 portrait lenses?

The portrait lenses have always been one of the most difficult choices for a professional photographer. Today, we have selected two capable choices when it comes to portrait lenses. We will compare the Nikon 105mm F/1.4 with the Sigma 105 mm f/1.4 Art for arriving at the best results in term of efficient performance.

The Nikon 105 mm f/1.4 – An overview

Check on Amazon

One of the best lenses in the short telephoto lens market, the AF-S NIKKOR 105mm f/1.4E ED Lens has been a favorite choice for photography enthusiasts around the globe. The lens is designed to work with the FX-format F-mount DSLRs and offers you an excellent low light functionality.

The lens also comes with incredible control over the focus. Thus you have access to a shallow depth of field. The lens also comes with nanocrystal coating to provide you relief from ghosting and flare.

A few features we found interesting enough include

Sigma 105 mm f/1.4 Art – An Overview

Check on Amazon

The advanced optical layout and a bright maximum aperture are the two features that make the Sigma 105 mm f/1.4 Art an exceptional choice and a formidable competitor to the Nikon 105 mm f/1.4 lens.

It offers you the same set of benefits like the excellent functionality under low light conditions and extensive control over the depth of field. You can work efficiently with the isolation of the objects and using a selective focus. It uses FLD and SLD glasses to avoid or reduce the chromatic aberration. The lens also comes with the Super multi-layer coating for reducing and eliminating the lens flare and ghosting effects.

Some of the features that may make it a good choice can be summed up as here below –

How do the lenses Compare? Sigma 105mm F1.4 Art vs Nikon 105mm F1.4

Well, from the above description – it should be evident that both the competing lenses come with an almost similar degree of compatibility, features, and functionality. However, there are a few minor differences that may make them slightly stay apart.

To begin with, the Sigma  105 mm f/1.4 Art is less expensive when you compare it to the Nikon 105 mm f/1.4. We have observed the price difference of around $ 500 to $ 600. If you are on a budget and still looking for a good quality of performance from your portrait lens, the Sigma offering should be an ideal choice for your needs.

The Sigma 105 mm lens is a more robust option when compared to the Nikon lens. It weighs almost double than the Nikon lens. This can be one of the reasons you may hesitate buying this lens, especially if you value portability as one of the crucial factors.

When it comes to letting in more light into the lens, the Nikon lens offers you better functionality and for the same image and exposure – it will let more light. One of the things we noticed from the usability point of view was that the Nikon lens has a focusing ring that can be moved quickly enough, while that on the Sigma lens felt somewhat tighter.

Tabular Comparison: Sigma 105mm F1.4 Art vs Nikon 105mm F1.4

A side by side comparison between the two lenses should ideally help you make the right decision concerning which lens would you want to go with. We will compare the features so that you can make it a perfect choice between the two.

Features

Nikon 105 mm f/1.4

[amazon_link asins=’B01J4S9YRI’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’9151b896-3222-4b70-8e04-01d578d9d1eb’]

Sigma 105 mm f/1.4

[amazon_link asins=’B07D9YGP5S’ template=’PriceLink’ store=’foi04-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’f11ece96-0832-47f4-9cb2-19efd137f98a’]

Focal Length 105 mm 105 mm
Camera mount Nikon F Nikon F
Angle of view 23°10′ degrees 23.3 degrees
Minimum focal distance 1 m 1 m
Lens construction 14 elements in 9 groups 17 elements in 12 groups
Diaphragm Nine rounded blades Nine rounded blades
Filter thread 82 mm 105 mm
Physical dimensions 94.5 x 106 mm 115.9 x 131.5 mm
Weight 985 grams 1640 grams

 

As can be seen from the above comparison table and the discussion we have had above – it should be clear enough that the two lenses offer you the same kind of functionality regarding their features and construction.

The Concluding Thoughts

Ultimately, based on what we could find from our time with the lenses and the specifications thereof, we fond that both the glasses come with the similar level of functionality and features, and produced an almost identical degree of image quality. The deciding factors, therefore, should ideally be the price which differs by nearly $600 and the weight of the lenses.

Which among those two lenses would you prefer for your experiments with the low light photography? Do share your expectations and experiences if any with these two competing capable f/1.4 lenses.

Exit mobile version